Literature DB >> 19210302

Invasion versus isolation: trade-offs in managing native salmonids with barriers to upstream movement.

Kurt D Fausch1, Bruce E Rieman, Jason B Dunham, Michael K Young, Douglas P Peterson.   

Abstract

Conservation biologists often face the trade-off that increasing connectivity in fragmented landscapes to reduce extinction risk of native species can foster invasion by non-native species that enter via the corridors created, which can then increase extinction risk. This dilemma is acute for stream fishes, especially native salmonids, because their populations are frequently relegated to fragments of headwater habitat threatened by invasion from downstream by 3 cosmopolitan non-native salmonids. Managers often block these upstream invasions with movement barriers, but isolation of native salmonids in small headwater streams can increase the threat of local extinction. We propose a conceptual framework to address this worldwide problem that focuses on 4 main questions. First, are populations of conservation value present (considering evolutionary legacies, ecological functions, and socioeconomic benefits as distinct values)? Second, are populations vulnerable to invasion and displacement by non-native salmonids? Third, would these populations be threatened with local extinction if isolated with barriers? And, fourth, how should management be prioritized among multiple populations? We also developed a conceptual model of the joint trade-off of invasion and isolation threats that considers the opportunities for managers to make strategic decisions. We illustrated use of this framework in an analysis of the invasion-isolation trade-off for native cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarkii) in 2 contrasting basins in western North America where invasion and isolation are either present and strong or farther away and apparently weak. These cases demonstrate that decisions to install or remove barriers to conserve native salmonids are often complex and depend on conservation values, environmental context (which influences the threat of invasion and isolation), and additional socioeconomic factors. Explicit analysis with tools such as those we propose can help managers make sound decisions in such complex circumstances.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19210302     DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01159.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Biol        ISSN: 0888-8892            Impact factor:   6.560


  16 in total

1.  Dealing with uncertainty when assessing fish passage through culvert road crossings.

Authors:  Gregory B Anderson; Mary C Freeman; Byron J Freeman; Carrie A Straight; Megan M Hagler; James T Peterson
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  A moving target--incorporating knowledge of the spatial ecology of fish into the assessment and management of freshwater fish populations.

Authors:  Steven J Cooke; Eduardo G Martins; Daniel P Struthers; Lee F G Gutowsky; Michael Power; Susan E Doka; John M Dettmers; David A Crook; Martyn C Lucas; Christopher M Holbrook; Charles C Krueger
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Species replacement by a nonnative salmonid alters ecosystem function by reducing prey subsidies that support riparian spiders.

Authors:  Joseph R Benjamin; Kurt D Fausch; Colden V Baxter
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2011-06-19       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Flow regime, temperature, and biotic interactions drive differential declines of trout species under climate change.

Authors:  Seth J Wenger; Daniel J Isaak; Charles H Luce; Helen M Neville; Kurt D Fausch; Jason B Dunham; Daniel C Dauwalter; Michael K Young; Marketa M Elsner; Bruce E Rieman; Alan F Hamlet; Jack E Williams
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-08-15       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Habitat connectivity and resident shared predators determine the impact of invasive bullfrogs on native frogs in farm ponds.

Authors:  Takashi Atobe; Yutaka Osada; Hayato Takeda; Misako Kuroe; Tadashi Miyashita
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 6.  Developing a broader scientific foundation for river restoration: Columbia River food webs.

Authors:  Robert J Naiman; J Richard Alldredge; David A Beauchamp; Peter A Bisson; James Congleton; Charles J Henny; Nancy Huntly; Roland Lamberson; Colin Levings; Erik N Merrill; William G Pearcy; Bruce E Rieman; Gregory T Ruggerone; Dennis Scarnecchia; Peter E Smouse; Chris C Wood
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Predicting fine-scale distributions of peripheral aquatic species in headwater streams.

Authors:  Christopher R DeRolph; Stacy A C Nelson; Thomas J Kwak; Ernie F Hain
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  Robust detection of rare species using environmental DNA: the importance of primer specificity.

Authors:  Taylor M Wilcox; Kevin S McKelvey; Michael K Young; Stephen F Jane; Winsor H Lowe; Andrew R Whiteley; Michael K Schwartz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Fish population genetic structure shaped by hydroelectric power plants in the upper Rhine catchment.

Authors:  Alexandre Gouskov; Marta Reyes; Lisa Wirthner-Bitterlin; Christoph Vorburger
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 5.183

10.  Climate, Demography, and Zoogeography Predict Introgression Thresholds in Salmonid Hybrid Zones in Rocky Mountain Streams.

Authors:  Michael K Young; Daniel J Isaak; Kevin S McKelvey; Taylor M Wilcox; Daniel M Bingham; Kristine L Pilgrim; Kellie J Carim; Matthew R Campbell; Matthew P Corsi; Dona L Horan; David E Nagel; Michael K Schwartz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.