Literature DB >> 19210301

Ability of wildlife overpasses to provide connectivity and prevent genetic isolation.

Luca Corlatti1, Klaus Hackländer, Fredy Frey-Roos.   

Abstract

We reviewed research on wildlife overpasses in the context of their genetic effectiveness to provide connectivity between population patches that have been isolated by road construction. The potential ecological consequences of such habitat fragmentation include reduction of gene flow between subpopulations and hence an increase in genetic differentiation and a decrease in genetic diversity. Among the solutions to provide connectivity between patches isolated by roads, wildlife overpasses are one of the most expensive alternatives. Despite the high costs associated with their construction, most of the studies assessing their use by wildlife remain observational, reporting evidence for passage use but few data on the number of individual crossings. Moreover, the use itself of wildlife overpasses does not appear sufficient to assess their effectiveness from a genetic viewpoint because a minimum number of individuals is required to assure gene flow between population patches and because the spatiotemporal dimension of individual movements and demographic parameters of subpopulations must be considered. So far, there is no evidence that wildlife overpasses do or do not efficiently address genetic issues. This lack of data is probably due to the fact that few mitigation efforts have implemented monitoring programs that incorporate sufficient experimental designs into pre- and postconstruction evaluation. To assess the genetic effectiveness of wildlife overpasses, long-term monitoring programs, including fieldwork and genetic analyses, are needed. ©2009 Society for Conservation Biology.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19210301     DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01162.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Biol        ISSN: 0888-8892            Impact factor:   6.560


  16 in total

1.  Genetic connectivity for two bear species at wildlife crossing structures in Banff National Park.

Authors:  Michael A Sawaya; Steven T Kalinowski; Anthony P Clevenger
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Roadless and Low-Traffic Areas as Conservation Targets in Europe.

Authors:  Nuria Selva; Stefan Kreft; Vassiliki Kati; Martin Schluck; Bengt-Gunnar Jonsson; Barbara Mihok; Henryk Okarma; Pierre L Ibisch
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2011-09-24       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Do bat gantries and underpasses help bats cross roads safely?

Authors:  Anna Berthinussen; John Altringham
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Genetic Variation, Structure, and Gene Flow in a Sloth Bear (Melursus ursinus) Meta-Population in the Satpura-Maikal Landscape of Central India.

Authors:  Trishna Dutta; Sandeep Sharma; Jesús E Maldonado; Hemendra Singh Panwar; John Seidensticker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Survival and Mortality of Pumas (Puma concolor) in a Fragmented, Urbanizing Landscape.

Authors:  T Winston Vickers; Jessica N Sanchez; Christine K Johnson; Scott A Morrison; Randy Botta; Trish Smith; Brian S Cohen; Patrick R Huber; Holly B Ernest; Walter M Boyce
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Do major roads reduce gene flow in urban bird populations?

Authors:  Shuping Zhang; Mingli Suo; Shenglin Liu; Wei Liang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Evaluating landscape options for corridor restoration between giant panda reserves.

Authors:  Fang Wang; William J McShea; Dajun Wang; Sheng Li; Qing Zhao; Hao Wang; Zhi Lu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-18       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Inter-individual variability of stone marten behavioral responses to a highway.

Authors:  Fernando Ascensão; Clara Grilo; Scott LaPoint; Jeff Tracey; Anthony P Clevenger; Margarida Santos-Reis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-29       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Comparative analysis of three different methods for monitoring the use of green bridges by wildlife.

Authors:  Goran Gužvica; Ivana Bošnjak; Ana Bielen; Danijel Babić; Biserka Radanović-Gužvica; Lidija Šver
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Comparative Population Genetic Structure of the Endangered Southern Brown Bandicoot, Isoodon obesulus, in Fragmented Landscapes of Southern Australia.

Authors:  You Li; Steven J B Cooper; Melanie L Lancaster; Jasmin G Packer; Susan M Carthew
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.