Literature DB >> 19209958

Replicating Milgram: Would people still obey today?

Jerry M Burger1.   

Abstract

The author conducted a partial replication of Stanley Milgram's (1963, 1965, 1974) obedience studies that allowed for useful comparisons with the original investigations while protecting the well-being of participants. Seventy adults participated in a replication of Milgram's Experiment 5 up to the point at which they first heard the learner's verbal protest (150 volts). Because 79% of Milgram's participants who went past this point continued to the end of the shock generator's range, reasonable estimates could be made about what the present participants would have done if allowed to continue. Obedience rates in the 2006 replication were only slightly lower than those Milgram found 45 years earlier. Contrary to expectation, participants who saw a confederate refuse the experimenter's instructions obeyed as often as those who saw no model. Men and women did not differ in their rates of obedience, but there was some evidence that individual differences in empathic concern and desire for control affected participants' responses. PsycINFO Database Record 2009 APA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19209958     DOI: 10.1037/a0010932

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Psychol        ISSN: 0003-066X


  21 in total

Review 1.  [Collective violence: neurobiological, psychosocial and sociological condition].

Authors:  A M Möller-Leimkühler; B Bogerts
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.214

2.  Moral Identity and Adolescent Prosocial and Antisocial Behaviors: Interactions with Moral Disengagement and Self-regulation.

Authors:  Sam A Hardy; Dallas S Bean; Joseph A Olsen
Journal:  J Youth Adolesc       Date:  2014-08-22

3.  Using simulation to address hierarchy-related errors in medical practice.

Authors:  Aaron William Calhoun; Megan C Boone; Melissa B Porter; Karen H Miller
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2014

4.  A Qualitative Analysis of Power Differentials in Ethical Situations in Academia.

Authors:  Carter Gibson; Kelsey E Medeiros; Vincent Giorgini; Jensen T Mecca; Lynn D Devenport; Shane Connelly; Michael D Mumford
Journal:  Ethics Behav       Date:  2014

5.  Defying Unjust Authority: An Exploratory Study.

Authors:  Piero Bocchiaro; Philip G Zimbardo
Journal:  Curr Psychol       Date:  2010-05-02

6.  The Effect of Distance on Moral Engagement: Event Related Potentials and Alpha Power are Sensitive to Perspective in a Virtual Shooting Task.

Authors:  Kirsten Petras; Sanne Ten Oever; Bernadette M Jansma
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-01-07

Review 7.  Bad machines corrupt good morals.

Authors:  Nils Köbis; Jean-François Bonnefon; Iyad Rahwan
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2021-06-03

8.  Socially anxious and confident men interact with a forward virtual woman: an experimental study.

Authors:  Xueni Pan; Marco Gillies; Chris Barker; David M Clark; Mel Slater
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Meta-Milgram: an empirical synthesis of the obedience experiments.

Authors:  Nick Haslam; Steve Loughnan; Gina Perry
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The Use of Virtual Reality in the Study of People's Responses to Violent Incidents.

Authors:  Aitor Rovira; David Swapp; Bernhard Spanlang; Mel Slater
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-12-23       Impact factor: 3.558

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.