Literature DB >> 19208870

Understanding the challenges of service change - learning from acute pain services in the UK.

A E Powell1, H T O Davies, J Bannister, W A Macrae.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To explore organizational difficulties faced when implementing national policy recommendations in local contexts.
DESIGN: Qualitative case study involving semi-structured interviews with health professionals and managers working in and around acute pain services.
SETTING: Three UK acute hospital organizations. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Identification of the content, context and process factors impacting on the implementation of the national policy recommendations on acute pain services; insights into and deeper understanding of the generic obstacles to change facing service improvements.
RESULTS: The process of implementing policy recommendations and improving services in each of the three organizations was undermined by multiple factors relating to: doubts and disagreements about the nature of the change; challenging local organizational contexts; and the beliefs, attitudes and responses of health professionals and managers. The impact of these factors was compounded by the interaction between them.
CONCLUSIONS: Local implementation of national policies aimed at service improvement can be undermined by multiple interacting factors. Particularly important are the pre-existing local organizational contexts and histories, and the deeply-ingrained attitudes, beliefs and assumptions of diverse staff groups. Without close attention to all of these underlying issues and how they interact in individual organizations against the background of local and national contexts, more resources or further structural change are unlikely to deliver the intended improvements in patient care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19208870      PMCID: PMC2642864          DOI: 10.1258/jrsm.2008.080194

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Med        ISSN: 0141-0768            Impact factor:   5.344


  9 in total

1.  Reshaping the NHS workforce.

Authors:  L Doyal; A Cameron
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-04-15

2.  Improving the quality of health care in the United Kingdom and the United States: a framework for change.

Authors:  E B Ferlie; S M Shortell
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.911

3.  Catching goldfish: quality in qualitative research.

Authors:  R Dingwall; E Murphy; P Watson; D Greatbatch; S Parker
Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  1998-07

Review 4.  Implementing culture change in health care: theory and practice.

Authors:  Tim Scott; Russell Mannion; Huw T O Davies; Martin N Marshall
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.038

Review 5.  Planning and studying improvement in patient care: the use of theoretical perspectives.

Authors:  Richard P T M Grol; Marije C Bosch; Marlies E J L Hulscher; Martin P Eccles; Michel Wensing
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.911

6.  Why don't clinicians engage with quality improvement?

Authors:  Huw Davies; Alison Powell; Rosemary Rushmer
Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  2007-07

7.  Time for organisational development in healthcare organisations. Improving quality for patients means changing the organisation.

Authors:  C Koeck
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-11-07

8.  Interprofessional collaboration in the hospital: strategies and meanings.

Authors:  Scott Reeves; Simon Lewin
Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  2004-10

9.  Rhetoric and reality on acute pain services in the UK: a national postal questionnaire survey.

Authors:  A E Powell; H T O Davies; J Bannister; W A Macrae
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2004-03-19       Impact factor: 9.166

  9 in total
  4 in total

1.  The medical miracles delusion.

Authors:  Jeffrey Braithwaite
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  The challenges of implementing national policies to contain antibiotic resistance in Swedish healthcare-A qualitative study of perceptions among healthcare professionals.

Authors:  Marta Röing; Ingeborg Björkman; Jaran Eriksen; Cecilia Stålsby Lundborg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Influence of societal and practice contexts on health professionals' clinical reasoning: a scoping study protocol.

Authors:  Annie Carrier; Mélanie Levasseur; Andrew Freeman; Gary Mullins; Suzanne Quénec'hdu; Louise Lalonde; Michaël Gagnon; Francis Lacasse
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-04-29       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Organizational contextual features that influence the implementation of evidence-based practices across healthcare settings: a systematic integrative review.

Authors:  Shelly-Anne Li; Lianne Jeffs; Melanie Barwick; Bonnie Stevens
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2018-05-05
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.