Literature DB >> 19208598

Is there an urban-rural divide? Population surveys of rheumatic musculoskeletal disorders in the Pune region of India using the COPCORD Bhigwan model.

Vaijayanti Lagu Joshi1, Arvind Chopra.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate urban prevalence of rheumatic musculoskeletal (MSK) disorders and compare to an earlier rural regional study.
METHODS: We screened 8145 adults from a preselected urban locality in Pune, India, for MSK pain in a cross-sectional house-to-house survey (Stage I) over 20 weeks. The World Health Organization-International League of Associations for Rheumatology (WHO-ILAR) Community Oriented Program for Control of Rheumatic Diseases (COPCORD) Bhigwan model was used. Thirty trained community volunteers completed Phases I and II questionnaires, concurrent with rheumatology evaluation (Phase III). Clinical diagnosis was based on standard diagnosis/classification criteria. Point prevalence rates from our survey and the earlier Bhigwan village (Pune district) survey were standardized (adjusted age-sex to India population census 2001) and are reported for osteoarthritis (OA), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), seronegative spondyloarthritis (SSA), and inflammatory arthritis (IA).
RESULTS: One thousand one hundred fifty-two urban cases (65% women) were identified (14.1%, 95% confidence interval 13.4, 14.9). The self-reported pain sites (Phase II) were hip (0.4), knees (6.3), ankle (1.9), feet (0.7), shoulders (2), hands (1.3), wrist (1.2), neck (1.9), upper back (1.7), low back (5.5), thigh (1.5), calf (1.4), and sole (0.8); corresponding rural sites being hip (1.1), knees (13.7), ankle (7), feet (1.6), shoulders (7.9), hands (6.3), wrist (6.9), neck (6.8), upper back (8.4), low back (12.6), thigh (4.8), calf (7.1) and sole (2.2). OA disorders, soft tissue rheumatism (STR) and ill-defined aches and pains were predominant in both surveys; < 10% reported IA. The major disorders among urban cases were OA (4), STR (1.2), RA (0.2, ACR criteria 1988), undifferentiated IA (0.3), SSA (0.3), and gout (0.06); corresponding rates in Bhigwan were OA (6.3), STR (3.8), RA (0.5), undifferentiated IA (0.8), SSA (0.3), and gout (0.1). Infections were conspicuously absent.
CONCLUSION: While similar in spectrum, standardized prevalence rates of self-reported pain sites and rheumatic MSK disorders were significantly lower in the urban (current Pune COPCORD surveys) versus rural (Bhigwan) community, and in both communities aches and pains that are poorly understood by modern science were predominant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19208598     DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.080675

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rheumatol        ISSN: 0315-162X            Impact factor:   4.666


  26 in total

Review 1.  Rheumatology in India--quo vadis?

Authors:  Rohini Handa
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 20.543

2.  Explaining rural/non-rural disparities in physical health-related quality of life: a study of United Methodist clergy in North Carolina.

Authors:  Andrew Miles; Rae Jean Proescholdbell; Eve Puffer
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 3.  Determinants of the prevalence of gout in the general population: a systematic review and meta-regression.

Authors:  José M A Wijnands; Wolfgang Viechtbauer; Kristof Thevissen; Ilja C W Arts; Pieter C Dagnelie; Coen D A Stehouwer; Sjef van der Linden; Annelies Boonen
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-07-27       Impact factor: 8.082

4.  Impact of musculoskeletal pain on physical function and health-related quality of life in a rural community in south India: a WHO-ILAR-COPCORD-BJD India study.

Authors:  Ashish Jacob Mathew; Arvind Chopra; Dany Varughese Thekkemuriyil; Elizabeth George; Vinay Goyal; Jayakumar Bhaskaran Nair
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 2.980

5.  Measuring the prevalence of chronic diseases using population surveys by pooling self-reported symptoms, diagnosis and treatments: results from the World Health Survey of 2003 for South Asia.

Authors:  J-F Levesque; S Mukherjee; D Grimard; A Boivin; S Mishra
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2013-02-23       Impact factor: 3.380

6.  The epidemiology of regional and widespread musculoskeletal pain in rural versus urban settings in those ≥55 years.

Authors:  Rachael E Docking; Marcus Beasley; Artur Steinerowski; Elizabeth A Jones; Jane Farmer; Gary J Macfarlane; Gareth T Jones
Journal:  Br J Pain       Date:  2015-05

Review 7.  Epidemiology of spondyloarthritis: a review.

Authors:  Gunnstein Bakland; Hans C Nossent
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 4.592

8.  Prevalence of musculoskeletal symptoms in the five urban regions of Brazil-the Brazilian COPCORD study (BRAZCO).

Authors:  Edgard Torres Dos Reis-Neto; Marcos Bosi Ferraz; Sérgio Candido Kowalski; Geraldo da Rocha Castelar Pinheiro; Emilia Inoue Sato
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 2.980

9.  WHO-ILAR COPCORD study (stage 1, urban study) in Sanandaj, Iran.

Authors:  Nasrin Moghimi; Fereydoun Davatchi; Ezat Rahimi; Afshin Saidi; Naser Rashadmanesh; Solmaz Moghimi; Hoshyar Ghafori; Peiman Zandi; Negin Ahmadi; Hamed Ghafori; Mohsen Moghimi; Marjan hajiheshmati
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2013-11-09       Impact factor: 2.980

10.  Ayurveda-modern medicine interface: A critical appraisal of studies of Ayurvedic medicines to treat osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Arvind Chopra; Manjit Saluja; Girish Tillu
Journal:  J Ayurveda Integr Med       Date:  2010-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.