Literature DB >> 19207698

Differences in ano-neorectal physiology of ileoanal and coloanal reconstructions for restorative proctectomy.

A D Rink1, W Kneist, I Radinski, A Guinot-Barona, H Lang, K H Vestweber.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Restorative proctectomy with straight coloanal anastomosis (CAA) and restorative proctocolectomy with ilealpouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) are options for maintaining bowel integrity after rectal resection. The aim of this study was to compare clinical function and anorectal physiology in patients treated with CAA and IPAA.
METHOD: Three-dimensional vector-manometry and neorectal volumetry were performed in straight CAA [53 patients (34 male)] and IPAA [61 patients (39 male)] for ulcerative colitis. Function was assessed using a 14 day incontinence diary.
RESULTS: Function was similar in both groups, but neorectal compliance and threshold volumes for sensation, urge and maximum tolerated volume (MTV) were significantly higher after IPAA than after CAA. Mean pressure, vector volume and sphincter symmetry at rest were significant determinants of continence in both groups but squeeze pressure did not correlate significantly with function in either group. Threshold volume, MTV, and compliance were significantly correlated with frequency of defecation in patients with IPAA but not with CAA.
CONCLUSION: A strong consistent resting anal sphincter pressure is one determinant of continence after both IPAA and CAA. Squeeze pressures do not influence the functional result. In IPAA but not CAA, the neorectum has a reservoir function which correlates with the postoperative frequency of defaecation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19207698     DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.01790.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 1462-8910            Impact factor:   3.788


  8 in total

1.  Intraoperative pelvic nerve stimulation performed under continuous electromyography of the internal anal sphincter.

Authors:  Werner Kneist; Daniel W Kauff; Roman K Rahimi Nedjat; Andreas D Rink; Axel Heimann; Karin Somerlik; Klaus P Koch; Thomas Doerge; Hauke Lang
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Topography of the extrinsic internal anal sphincter nerve supply during laparoscopic-assisted TAMIS TME: five key zones of risk from the surgeons' view.

Authors:  Werner Kneist; Andreas D Rink; Daniel W Kauff; Moritz A Konerding; Hauke Lang
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 3.  [Low anterior resection syndrome-Causes and treatment approaches].

Authors:  Sigmar Stelzner; Juliane Kupsch; Sören Torge Mees
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  [Hybrid TAMIS total mesorectal excision. A new perspective in treatment of distal rectal cancer - Technique and results].

Authors:  A D Rink; D W Kauff; M Paschold; K-H Vestweber; H Lang; W Kneist
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 5.  Gastrointestinal motility disorders in inflammatory bowel diseases.

Authors:  Gabrio Bassotti; Elisabetta Antonelli; Vincenzo Villanacci; Marianna Salemme; Manuela Coppola; Vito Annese
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  MRI defecography of the ileal pouch-anal anastomosis-contributes little to the understanding of functional outcome.

Authors:  M L Sunde; A Negård; T Øresland; N Bakka; J T Geitung; A E Færden
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 7.  Abnormal gut motility in inflammatory bowel disease: an update.

Authors:  G Bassotti; E Antonelli; V Villanacci; R Nascimbeni; M P Dore; G M Pes; G Maconi
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2020-02-15       Impact factor: 3.781

8.  Anorectal Function After Ileo-Rectal Anastomosis Is Better than Pelvic Pouch in Selected Ulcerative Colitis Patients.

Authors:  Maie Abdalla; Rickard Norblad; Malin Olsson; Kalle Landerholm; Peter Andersson; Johan D Söderholm; Roland Andersson; Pär Myrelid
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 3.199

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.