OBJECTIVES: To longitudinally describe prosocial behaviour development from childhood to adolescence, using multiple informants within Canadian and Italian samples. METHOD: Participants in Study 1 were 1037 boys from low socioeconomic status (SES) areas in Montreal, Canada, for whom yearly teacher and mother reports were obtained between the ages of 10 and 15. Participants in Study 2 were 472 children (209 girls) from Genzano, Italy, for whom yearly self and teacher reports were obtained between the ages of 10 and 14. Developmental trajectories were estimated from ratings by each informant to identify subgroups of children following distinct courses of prosocial development. RESULTS: In Study 1, three trajectory groups (low/declining 53%, high/declining 16%, high/steep declining 31%) were identified from teacher ratings, while five trajectories (low/stable 7%, low/declining 19%, moderate/stable 41%, high/declining 24%, high/stable 9%) were identified from mother ratings. Small but significant associations were observed between mother and teacher ratings. In Study 2, three trajectory groups (low/stable 9%, moderate/stable 50%, high/stable 42%) were identified from self-ratings, while four trajectory groups (low/stable 8%, moderate/declining 48%, high/declining 37%, increasing 7%) were identified from teacher ratings. Small but significant associations were observed between self- and teacher ratings. CONCLUSIONS: The present studies investigated levels of prosocial behaviours from childhood to adolescence, using a multi-informant, cross-cultural perspective. All but one of the developmental trajectories identified were characterised by stable or declining levels of prosocial behaviours. Further research longitudinally investigating prosociality across developmental periods is needed to clarify prosocial behaviour development over time.
OBJECTIVES: To longitudinally describe prosocial behaviour development from childhood to adolescence, using multiple informants within Canadian and Italian samples. METHOD:Participants in Study 1 were 1037 boys from low socioeconomic status (SES) areas in Montreal, Canada, for whom yearly teacher and mother reports were obtained between the ages of 10 and 15. Participants in Study 2 were 472 children (209 girls) from Genzano, Italy, for whom yearly self and teacher reports were obtained between the ages of 10 and 14. Developmental trajectories were estimated from ratings by each informant to identify subgroups of children following distinct courses of prosocial development. RESULTS: In Study 1, three trajectory groups (low/declining 53%, high/declining 16%, high/steep declining 31%) were identified from teacher ratings, while five trajectories (low/stable 7%, low/declining 19%, moderate/stable 41%, high/declining 24%, high/stable 9%) were identified from mother ratings. Small but significant associations were observed between mother and teacher ratings. In Study 2, three trajectory groups (low/stable 9%, moderate/stable 50%, high/stable 42%) were identified from self-ratings, while four trajectory groups (low/stable 8%, moderate/declining 48%, high/declining 37%, increasing 7%) were identified from teacher ratings. Small but significant associations were observed between self- and teacher ratings. CONCLUSIONS: The present studies investigated levels of prosocial behaviours from childhood to adolescence, using a multi-informant, cross-cultural perspective. All but one of the developmental trajectories identified were characterised by stable or declining levels of prosocial behaviours. Further research longitudinally investigating prosociality across developmental periods is needed to clarify prosocial behaviour development over time.
Authors: Isaac J Washburn; Alan Acock; Sam Vuchinich; Frank Snyder; Kin-Kit Li; Peter Ji; Joseph Day; David DuBois; Brian R Flay Journal: Prev Sci Date: 2011-09
Authors: Gian Vittorio Caprara; Bernadette Paula Luengo Kanacri; Antonio Zuffianò; Maria Gerbino; Concetta Pastorelli Journal: J Youth Adolesc Date: 2015-05-12
Authors: Concetta Pastorelli; Jennifer E Lansford; Bernadette Paula Luengo Kanacri; Patrick S Malone; Laura Di Giunta; Dario Bacchini; Anna Silvia Bombi; Arnaldo Zelli; Maria Concetta Miranda; Marc H Bornstein; Sombat Tapanya; Liliana Maria Uribe Tirado; Liane Pena Alampay; Suha M Al-Hassan; Lei Chang; Kirby Deater-Deckard; Kenneth A Dodge; Paul Oburu; Ann T Skinner; Emma Sorbring Journal: J Child Psychol Psychiatry Date: 2015-10-28 Impact factor: 8.982
Authors: Laura K Taylor; Christine E Merrilees; Rachel Baird; Marcie C Goeke-Morey; Peter Shirlow; E Mark Cummings Journal: Dev Psychol Date: 2018-07-30
Authors: Kendra M Lewis; Samuel Vuchinich; Peter Ji; David L DuBois; Alan Acock; Niloofar Bavarian; Joseph Day; Naida Silverthorn; Brian R Flay Journal: Appl Dev Sci Date: 2015-05-29