Literature DB >> 19207278

Historical review of penile prosthesis design and surgical techniques: part 1 of a three-part review series on penile prosthetic surgery.

Gerard D Henry1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Throughout history, many attempts to cure complete impotence have been recorded. Early attempts at a surgical approach involved the placement of rigid devices to support the natural process of erection formation. However, these early attempts placed the devices outside of the corpora cavernosa, with high rates of erosion and infection. Today, most urologists in the United States now place an inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) with an antibiotic coating inside the tunica albuginea. AIM: The article describes the key historical landmarks in penile prosthesis design and surgical techniques.
METHODS: The article reviews and evaluates the published literature for important contributions to penile prosthesis design and surgical techniques. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The article reviews and evaluates the historical landmarks in penile prosthesis design and surgical techniques that appear to improve outcomes and advance the field of prosthetic urology for the treatment of erectile dysfunction. Results. The current review demonstrates the stepwise progression starting with the use of stenting for achieving rigidity in the impotent patient. Modern advances were first used in war-injured patients which led to early implantation with foreign material. The design and techniques of penile prostheses placement have advanced such that now, more complications are linked to medical issues than failure of the implant.
CONCLUSIONS: Today's IPPs have high patient satisfaction rates with low mechanical failure rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19207278     DOI: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2008.01145.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sex Med        ISSN: 1743-6095            Impact factor:   3.802


  17 in total

Review 1.  Innovating Incrementally: Development of the Modern Inflatable Penile Prosthesis.

Authors:  Mark Ehlers; Benjamin McCormick; R Matthew Coward; Bradley D Figler
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 2.  Current Status for Semirigid Penile Prosthetic Devices.

Authors:  Raul E Fernandez-Crespo; Kristina Buscaino; Justin Parker; Rafael Carrion
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Longitudinal and Horizontal Load Testing of Inflatable Penile Implant Cylinders of Two Manufacturers: An Ex Vivo Demonstration of Inflated Rigidity.

Authors:  Jason M Scovell; Liehui Ge; Enrique V Barrera; Steven K Wilson; Rafael E Carrion; Tariq S Hakky
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 3.802

Review 4.  The evolution of the inflatable penile prosthetic device and surgical innovations with anatomical considerations.

Authors:  Tariq S Hakky; Run Wang; Gerard D Henry
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  Penile prosthesis implantation for the treatment for male erectile dysfunction: clinical outcomes and lessons learnt after 955 procedures.

Authors:  E Chung; C T Van; I Wilson; R A Cartmill
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 6.  Erectile Dysfunction: A Review of Historical Treatments With a Focus on the Development of the Inflatable Penile Prosthesis.

Authors:  Kristen Gurtner; Amanda Saltzman; Kristi Hebert; Eric Laborde
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2015-07-23

Review 7.  A Surgeon's Guide to the Various Antibiotic Dips Available During Penile Prosthesis Implantation.

Authors:  Soum D Lokeshwar; Joshua Bitran; Vinayak Madhusoodanan; Bruce Kava; Ranjith Ramasamy
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 3.092

8.  Clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction rates among elderly male aged ≥75 years with inflatable penile prosthesis implant for medically refractory erectile dysfunction.

Authors:  Eric Chung; Matt Solomon; Ling DeYoung; Gerald B Brock
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-05-26       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Subarachnoid versus General Anesthesia in Penile Prosthetic Implantation: Outcomes Analyses.

Authors:  Gerard D Henry; Antonino Saccà; Elizabeth Eisenhart; Mario A Cleves; Andrew C Kramer
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2012-08-15

Review 10.  Evolution of penile prosthetic devices.

Authors:  Brian Le; Arthur L Burnett
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2015-03-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.