OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of a 2-year programme for community-based delivery of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) on intermittent preventive treatment during pregnancy coverage, antenatal clinic attendance and pregnancy outcome. METHODS: Fourteen intervention and 12 control villages in the catchment areas of Chikwawa and Ngabu Government Hospitals, southern Malawi, were selected. Village-based community health workers were trained in information, education and counselling on malaria control in pregnancy and the importance of attending antenatal clinics and promoted these messages to pregnant women. In the intervention group community health workers also distributed SP to pregnant women. RESULTS: In the control area, coverage of intermittent preventive treatment during pregnancy (>2 doses) was low before (44.1%) and during the intervention (46.1%). In the intervention area, coverage increased from 41.5% to 82.9% (P < 0.01). Antenatal clinic attendance (>2 visits) was maintained in control villages at above 90%, but fell in intervention villages from 87.3% to 51.5% (P < 0.01). Post-natal malaria parasitaemia prevalence fell in women from both study areas during the intervention phase (P < 0.05). Increasing the coverage of intermittent preventive treatment during pregnancy to >40% did not significantly improve maternal haemoglobin or reduce low birthweight prevalence. CONCLUSIONS: Better coverage of community-based intermittent preventive treatment during pregnancy can lower attendance at antenatal clinics; thus its effect on pregnancy outcome and antenatal attendance need to be monitored.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of a 2-year programme for community-based delivery of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) on intermittent preventive treatment during pregnancy coverage, antenatal clinic attendance and pregnancy outcome. METHODS: Fourteen intervention and 12 control villages in the catchment areas of Chikwawa and Ngabu Government Hospitals, southern Malawi, were selected. Village-based community health workers were trained in information, education and counselling on malaria control in pregnancy and the importance of attending antenatal clinics and promoted these messages to pregnant women. In the intervention group community health workers also distributed SP to pregnant women. RESULTS: In the control area, coverage of intermittent preventive treatment during pregnancy (>2 doses) was low before (44.1%) and during the intervention (46.1%). In the intervention area, coverage increased from 41.5% to 82.9% (P < 0.01). Antenatal clinic attendance (>2 visits) was maintained in control villages at above 90%, but fell in intervention villages from 87.3% to 51.5% (P < 0.01). Post-natal malaria parasitaemia prevalence fell in women from both study areas during the intervention phase (P < 0.05). Increasing the coverage of intermittent preventive treatment during pregnancy to >40% did not significantly improve maternal haemoglobin or reduce low birthweight prevalence. CONCLUSIONS: Better coverage of community-based intermittent preventive treatment during pregnancy can lower attendance at antenatal clinics; thus its effect on pregnancy outcome and antenatal attendance need to be monitored.
Authors: Rehana A Salam; Bushra Syed; Sadia Syed; Jai K Das; Noel M Zagre; P Rayco-Solon; Zulfiqar A Bhutta Journal: Afr Health Sci Date: 2015-06 Impact factor: 0.927
Authors: Anne-Maria Rantala; Steve M Taylor; Paul A Trottman; Mari Luntamo; Bernard Mbewe; Kenneth Maleta; Teija Kulmala; Per Ashorn; Steven R Meshnick Journal: Malar J Date: 2010-10-06 Impact factor: 2.979
Authors: Anna Maria van Eijk; Jenny Hill; Victor A Alegana; Viola Kirui; Peter W Gething; Feiko O ter Kuile; Robert W Snow Journal: Lancet Infect Dis Date: 2011-01-26 Impact factor: 25.071
Authors: Margaret Kweku; Jayne Webster; Martin Adjuik; Samuel Abudey; Brian Greenwood; Daniel Chandramohan Journal: PLoS One Date: 2009-09-30 Impact factor: 3.240