Literature DB >> 19206857

Density imaging using inverse scattering.

Roberto J Lavarello1, Michael L Oelze.   

Abstract

Inverse scattering is considered one of the most robust and accurate ultrasonic tomography methods. Most inverse scattering formulations neglect density changes in order to reconstruct sound speed and acoustic attenuation. Some studies available in literature suggest that density distributions can also be recovered using inverse scattering formulations. Two classes of algorithms have been identified. (1) The separation of sound speed and density contributions from reconstructions using constant density inverse scattering algorithms at multiple frequencies. (2) The inversion of the full wave equation including density changes. In this work, the performance of a representative algorithm for each class has been studied for the reconstruction of circular cylinders: the dual frequency distorted Born iterative method (DF-DBIM) and the T-matrix formulation. Root mean square error values lower than 30% were obtained with both algorithms when reconstructing cylinders up to eight wavelengths in diameter with moderate density changes. However, in order to provide accurate reconstructions the DF-DBIM and T-matrix method required very high signal-to-noise ratios and significantly large bandwidths, respectively. These limitations are discussed in the context of practical experimental implementations.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19206857     DOI: 10.1121/1.3050249

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  12 in total

1.  Fast inverse scattering solutions using the distorted Born iterative method and the multilevel fast multipole algorithm.

Authors:  Andrew J Hesford; Weng C Chew
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Comparison of temporal and spectral scattering methods using acoustically large breast models derived from magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  Andrew J Hesford; Jason C Tillett; Jeffrey P Astheimer; Robert C Waag
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Improving accuracy through density correction in guided wave tomography.

Authors:  P Huthwaite
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.704

4.  Guided wave tomography with an improved scattering model.

Authors:  P Huthwaite
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.704

5.  Acoustic beam anomalies in automated breast imaging.

Authors:  Rungroj Jintamethasawat; Xiaohui Zhang; Paul L Carson; Marilyn A Roubidoux; Oliver D Kripfgans
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-10-12

6.  Tomographic density imaging using modified DF-DBIM approach.

Authors:  Tran Quang Huy; Nguyen Thi Cuc; Van Dung Nguyen; Ton That Long; Tran Duc Tan
Journal:  Biomed Eng Lett       Date:  2019-08-20

7.  The Fast Multipole Method and Fourier Convolution for the Solution of Acoustic Scattering on Regular Volumetric Grids.

Authors:  Andrew J Hesford; Robert C Waag
Journal:  J Comput Phys       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 3.553

8.  Reduced-Rank Approximations to the Far-Field Transform in the Gridded Fast Multipole Method.

Authors:  Andrew J Hesford; Robert C Waag
Journal:  J Comput Phys       Date:  2011-05-10       Impact factor: 3.553

9.  Regularized Dual Averaging Image Reconstruction for Full-Wave Ultrasound Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Thomas P Matthews; Kun Wang; Cuiping Li; Neb Duric; Mark A Anastasio
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 2.725

10.  Waveform inversion with source encoding for breast sound speed reconstruction in ultrasound computed tomography.

Authors:  Kun Wang; Thomas Matthews; Fatima Anis; Cuiping Li; Neb Duric; Mark A Anastasio
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.725

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.