OBJECTIVES: To quantify gynecological cancer survivors' referral to, awareness of, utilization of and satisfaction with community support services, as well as the factors associated with service use. METHODS: In 2004, 802 gynecological cancer survivors, 3 months-5 years post-diagnosis, completed a postal questionnaire (56% response rate). Descriptive statistics summarized outcome prevalences. Logistic regression models identified correlates of service utilization. RESULTS: Substantial proportions of women were aware of the main cancer support organization, Cancer Council Queensland (72%), and of information booklets (74%), helplines (66%), support groups (56%) and internet information (50%). Less than half were aware of other services. The most commonly used resources and services were information booklets (37%), the internet (23%), and helplines (20%). More broadly, 43% utilized information/internet support, 30% utilized psychosocial services and 27% utilized functional/practical services. Approximately one-fifth (19%) used more than one support types. Having a health-care provider referral, being diagnosed with lymphedema or living in northern Queensland were associated with higher odds of service use in all three of the support types. While most (86%) of those referred used a service, only a few women received referrals. Among users, satisfaction with services was high. CONCLUSIONS: While gynecological cancer survivors accessed a variety of support, there is a need to ensure women are aware of services. Given the low prevalence of referrals and that referral was a key influence on service use, clinician education may be necessary to improve service referral. Organizations should also consider strategies to keep services high on clinicians' radars. (c) 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
OBJECTIVES: To quantify gynecological cancer survivors' referral to, awareness of, utilization of and satisfaction with community support services, as well as the factors associated with service use. METHODS: In 2004, 802 gynecological cancer survivors, 3 months-5 years post-diagnosis, completed a postal questionnaire (56% response rate). Descriptive statistics summarized outcome prevalences. Logistic regression models identified correlates of service utilization. RESULTS: Substantial proportions of women were aware of the main cancer support organization, Cancer Council Queensland (72%), and of information booklets (74%), helplines (66%), support groups (56%) and internet information (50%). Less than half were aware of other services. The most commonly used resources and services were information booklets (37%), the internet (23%), and helplines (20%). More broadly, 43% utilized information/internet support, 30% utilized psychosocial services and 27% utilized functional/practical services. Approximately one-fifth (19%) used more than one support types. Having a health-care provider referral, being diagnosed with lymphedema or living in northern Queensland were associated with higher odds of service use in all three of the support types. While most (86%) of those referred used a service, only a few women received referrals. Among users, satisfaction with services was high. CONCLUSIONS: While gynecological cancer survivors accessed a variety of support, there is a need to ensure women are aware of services. Given the low prevalence of referrals and that referral was a key influence on service use, clinician education may be necessary to improve service referral. Organizations should also consider strategies to keep services high on clinicians' radars. (c) 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Authors: David J T Marco; Anna G Boltong; Adrian Dabscheck; Georgina Akers; Michelle Pryce; Victoria M White Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2017-09-17 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Bernard M Garrett; John L Oliffe; Joan L Bottorff; Michael McKenzie; Christina S Han; John S Ogrodniczuk Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2014-03-28 Impact factor: 2.497
Authors: Ana Babac; Martin Frank; Frédéric Pauer; Svenja Litzkendorf; Daniel Rosenfeldt; Verena Lührs; Lisa Biehl; Tobias Hartz; Holger Storf; Franziska Schauer; Thomas O F Wagner; J-Matthias Graf von der Schulenburg Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2018-02-09 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Tracy E Crane; Terry A Badger; Patrick O'Connor; Chris Segrin; Alexis Alvarez; Sarah J Freylersythe; Irlena Penaloza; Thaddeus W W Pace; Alla Sikorskii Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2020-11-10 Impact factor: 4.442