M S Sasaki1. 1. Radiation Biology Center, Kyoto University, Yoshida-konoecho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan. msasaki@emp.mbox.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Abstract
PURPOSE: For more than 70 years radiation cytogenetics has continued to be a topic of major concern in relation to the action of radiation on living cells. To date, diverse cytogenetic findings have developed into orderly, quantitative interpretations and have stimulated numerous biophysical models. However, it is generally agreed that any one of the models used alone is still unable to explain all aspects of the observed chromosomal effects. In this review, a large number of radiation-induced chromosome aberration findings from the literature are reassessed with special attention given to the reaction kinetics and the relevant molecular processes. CONCLUSION: It is now clear that DNA double-strand breaks (DSB) are an integral component of radiation-induced chromosome aberration. At the nexus of the maintenance of genome integrity, cells are equipped with excellent systems to repair DSB, notably non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) and homologous recombination repair (HRR). These repair mechanisms are strictly regulated along with the DNA turnover cycle. NHEJ functions in all phases of the cell cycle, whereas HRR has a supplementary role specifically in S/G2 phase, where homologous DNA sequences are available in close proximity. The repair pathways are further regulated by a complex nuclear dynamism, where DSB are sensed and large numbers of repair proteins are recruited and assembled to form a repair complex involving multiple DSB. Considering such DSB repair dynamism, radiation-induced chromosome aberrations could be well understood as DSB-DSB pairwise interactions associated with the NHEJ pathway in all phases of the cell cycle and misrepair of a single DSB associated with the complementary HRR pathway in late S/G2 phase.
PURPOSE: For more than 70 years radiation cytogenetics has continued to be a topic of major concern in relation to the action of radiation on living cells. To date, diverse cytogenetic findings have developed into orderly, quantitative interpretations and have stimulated numerous biophysical models. However, it is generally agreed that any one of the models used alone is still unable to explain all aspects of the observed chromosomal effects. In this review, a large number of radiation-induced chromosome aberration findings from the literature are reassessed with special attention given to the reaction kinetics and the relevant molecular processes. CONCLUSION: It is now clear that DNA double-strand breaks (DSB) are an integral component of radiation-induced chromosome aberration. At the nexus of the maintenance of genome integrity, cells are equipped with excellent systems to repair DSB, notably non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) and homologous recombination repair (HRR). These repair mechanisms are strictly regulated along with the DNA turnover cycle. NHEJ functions in all phases of the cell cycle, whereas HRR has a supplementary role specifically in S/G2 phase, where homologous DNA sequences are available in close proximity. The repair pathways are further regulated by a complex nuclear dynamism, where DSB are sensed and large numbers of repair proteins are recruited and assembled to form a repair complex involving multiple DSB. Considering such DSB repair dynamism, radiation-induced chromosome aberrations could be well understood as DSB-DSB pairwise interactions associated with the NHEJ pathway in all phases of the cell cycle and misrepair of a single DSB associated with the complementary HRR pathway in late S/G2 phase.
Authors: Steen J Bonnema; Elisabeth S Stovgaard; Søren Fast; Kasper Broedbaek; Jon T Andersen; Allan Weimann; Peter Grupe; Laszlo Hegedüs; Henrik E Poulsen Journal: Eur Thyroid J Date: 2015-02-11
Authors: Benjamin B Williams; Ruhong Dong; Roberto J Nicolalde; Thomas P Matthews; David J Gladstone; Eugene Demidenko; Bassem I Zaki; Ildar K Salikhov; Piotr N Lesniewski; Harold M Swartz Journal: Int J Radiat Biol Date: 2011-06-23 Impact factor: 2.694
Authors: Harold M Swartz; Ann Barry Flood; Robert M Gougelet; Michael E Rea; Roberto J Nicolalde; Benjamin B Williams Journal: Health Phys Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 1.316
Authors: Alexandra N Bogomazova; Maria A Lagarkova; Leyla V Tskhovrebova; Maria V Shutova; Sergey L Kiselev Journal: Aging (Albany NY) Date: 2011-06 Impact factor: 5.682