Literature DB >> 19204989

Commitment to meiosis: what determines the mode of division in budding yeast?

Giora Simchen1.   

Abstract

In budding yeast, commitment to meiosis is attained when meiotic cells cannot return to the mitotic cell cycle even if the triggering cue (nutrients deprivation) is withdrawn. Commitment is arrived at gradually, and different aspects of meiosis may be committed at different times. Cells become fully committed to meiosis at the end of Prophase I, long after DNA replication and just before the first meiotic division (M(I)). Whole-genome gene expression analysis has shown that committed cells have a distinct and rapid response to nutrients, and are not simply insulated from environmental signals. Thus becoming committed to meiosis is an active process. The cellular event most likely to be associated with commitment to meiosis is the separation of the duplicated spindle-pole bodies (SPBs) and the formation of the spindle. Commitment to the mitotic cell cycle is also associated with the separation of SPBs, although it occurs in G1, before DNA replication.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19204989     DOI: 10.1002/bies.200800124

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioessays        ISSN: 0265-9247            Impact factor:   4.345


  27 in total

1.  Acetate regulation of spore formation is under the control of the Ras/cyclic AMP/protein kinase A pathway and carbon dioxide in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Marc Jungbluth; Hans-Ulrich Mösch; Christof Taxis
Journal:  Eukaryot Cell       Date:  2012-06-01

2.  A-MYB (MYBL1) transcription factor is a master regulator of male meiosis.

Authors:  Ewelina Bolcun-Filas; Laura A Bannister; Alex Barash; Kerry J Schimenti; Suzanne A Hartford; John J Eppig; Mary Ann Handel; Lishuang Shen; John C Schimenti
Journal:  Development       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 6.868

3.  The Ime2 protein kinase enhances the disassociation of the Sum1 repressor from middle meiotic promoters.

Authors:  Noreen T Ahmed; David Bungard; Marcus E Shin; Michael Moore; Edward Winter
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2009-06-15       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 4.  Molecular regulation of the mitosis/meiosis decision in multicellular organisms.

Authors:  Judith Kimble
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 10.005

Review 5.  The meiotic checkpoint network: step-by-step through meiotic prophase.

Authors:  Vijayalakshmi V Subramanian; Andreas Hochwagen
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 10.005

6.  The Cdk1 and Ime2 protein kinases trigger exit from meiotic prophase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by inhibiting the Sum1 transcriptional repressor.

Authors:  Marcus E Shin; Aikaterini Skokotas; Edward Winter
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2010-04-12       Impact factor: 4.272

7.  Distinct temporal requirements for autophagy and the proteasome in yeast meiosis.

Authors:  Fu-ping Wen; Yue-shuai Guo; Yang Hu; Wei-xiao Liu; Qian Wang; Yuan-ting Wang; Hai-Yan Yu; Chao-ming Tang; Jun Yang; Tao Zhou; Zhi-ping Xie; Jia-hao Sha; Xuejiang Guo; Wei Li
Journal:  Autophagy       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 16.016

Review 8.  The Sum1/Ndt80 transcriptional switch and commitment to meiosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Edward Winter
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 11.056

9.  Molecular determinants of sporulation in Ashbya gossypii.

Authors:  Lisa Wasserstrom; Klaus B Lengeler; Andrea Walther; Jürgen Wendland
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Multisite phosphorylation of the Sum1 transcriptional repressor by S-phase kinases controls exit from meiotic prophase in yeast.

Authors:  Daniel Corbi; Sham Sunder; Michael Weinreich; Aikaterini Skokotas; Erica S Johnson; Edward Winter
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2014-04-07       Impact factor: 4.272

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.