Literature DB >> 19204661

Robotic radical hysterectomy.

J Fanning1, R Hojat, J Johnson, B Fenton.   

Abstract

Robotic radical hysterectomy is increasingly being utilized in the treatment of cervical cancer and initial studies are promising. Compared to open radical hysterectomy, robotic radical hysterectomy is expected to result in decreased pain, infection, length of stay, and adhesions and quicker return to activity. Prospective randomized controlled trials are needed to compare robotic, laparoscopic and open radical hysterectomy for the treatment of cervical cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2009        PMID： 19204661

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Minerva Ginecol        ISSN： 0026-4784


  9 in total

1.  The twenty-first century role of Piver-Rutledge type III radical hysterectomy and FIGO stage IA, IB1, and IB2 cervical cancer in the era of robotic surgery: a personal perspective.

Authors:  M Steven Piver; Ali Ghomi
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2010-12-31       Impact factor: 4.401

2.  The technique of robotic assisted laparoscopic surgery in gynaecology, its introduction into the clinical routine of a gynaecological department and the analysis of the perioperative courses - a German experience.

Authors:  A Kubilay Ertan; Michael Ulbricht; Kirsten Huebner; Alexander Di Liberto
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2011-06-01

3.  Da Vinci robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy procedural guide.

Authors:  Cecelia Boardman; Adam Huggins; Kathryn Hull
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2011-03-12

4.  Expanding the indications for radical trachelectomy: a report on 29 patients with stage IB1 tumors measuring 2 to 4 centimeters.

Authors:  Stephanie L Wethington; Yukio Sonoda; Kay J Park; Kaled M Alektiar; William P Tew; Dennis S Chi; Mario M Leitao; Elizabeth L Jewell; Richard R Barakat; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 3.437

5.  Laparoscopic major gynecologic surgery in patients with prior laparotomy bowel resection.

Authors:  James Fanning; Rod Hojat; Timothy Deimling
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2011 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

6.  Effects of electrosurgery and vaginal closure technique on postoperative vaginal cuff dehiscence.

Authors:  James Fanning; Joshua Kesterson; Matthew Davies; Janis Green; Lindsey Penezic; Roberto Vargas; Gerald Harkins
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2013 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

7.  Minimally invasive hysterectomy at a university teaching hospital.

Authors:  Michael Mitri; James Fanning; Matthew Davies; Joshua Kesterson; Serdar Ural; Allen Kunselman; Gerald Harkins
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2014 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

8.  Long-term oncological outcome in patients with cervical cancer after 3 trimodality treatment (radiotherapy, platinum-based chemotherapy, and robotic surgery).

Authors:  Oana Gabriela Trifanescu; Laurentia Nicoleta Gales; Georgia Luiza Serbanescu; Anca Florina Zgura; Laura Iliescu; Claudia Mehedintu; Rodica Maricela Anghel
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-04-02       Impact factor: 1.817

9.  Learning curve analysis of robot-assisted radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: initial experience at a single institution.

Authors:  Ga Won Yim; Sang Wun Kim; Eun Ji Nam; Sunghoon Kim; Young Tae Kim
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 4.401
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.