Literature DB >> 1920452

Mitochondrial DNA sequence divergence in the Melanogaster and oriental species subgroups of Drosophila.

L Nigro1, M Solignac, P M Sharp.   

Abstract

The nucleotide sequence of a segment of the mitochondrial DNA from three Drosophila species (D. erecta, D. eugracilis, and D. takahashii), belonging to different subgroups of the melanogaster group has been determined. The segment encompasses three complete tRNA genes (tRNAtrp, tRNAcys, and tRNAtyr) and portions of two protein-coding genes: the subunit 2 of the NADH dehydrogenase (ND2) and the subunit 1 of the cytochrome oxidase (COI). Comparisons also involve homologous sequences already known for four other Drosophila species of the melanogaster group. Length differences were confined in the intergenic region where a long stretch of AT repeats was observed in one of the species analyzed. The three tRNA genes exhibit very different evolutionary rates, the most slowly evolving one, tRNAtyr, is adjacent to the 5' end of COI; tRNAs in similar positions have been previously shown to evolve slowly because they are probably involved in transcript processing. Although the rate of synonymous substitutions was very similar between ND2 and COI genes there were strong discrepancies between them in terms of the number of nonsynonymous substitutions. Differences have also been found in G + C content of the genes, which are likely to be linked to different selective pressures. There is a reduction in G + C content in the region where selective constraints are reduced. This suggests the existence of different levels of constraints along the sequenced segment. An overall analysis of the types of substitutions showed a decrease in A + T content during the course of evolution of the species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1920452     DOI: 10.1007/bf02193630

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Evol        ISSN: 0022-2844            Impact factor:   2.395


  16 in total

1.  Silent nucleotide substitutions and G + C content of some mitochondrial and bacterial genes.

Authors:  T H Jukes; V Bhushan
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.395

2.  Shifting constraints on tRNA genes during mitochondrial DNA evolution in animals.

Authors:  W K Thomas; J Maa; A C Wilson
Journal:  New Biol       Date:  1989-10

3.  The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees.

Authors:  N Saitou; M Nei
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 16.240

4.  Tempo and mode of sequence evolution in mitochondrial DNA of Hawaiian Drosophila.

Authors:  R DeSalle; T Freedman; E M Prager; A C Wilson
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.395

5.  Drosophila melanogaster mitochondrial DNA, a novel organization and genetic code.

Authors:  M H de Bruijn
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1983 Jul 21-27       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 6.  A new method for estimating synonymous and nonsynonymous rates of nucleotide substitution considering the relative likelihood of nucleotide and codon changes.

Authors:  W H Li; C I Wu; C C Luo
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 16.240

7.  Mitochondrial DNA evolution in the melanogaster species subgroup of Drosophila.

Authors:  M Solignac; M Monnerot; J C Mounolou
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.395

8.  Mitochondrial DNA sequences of primates: tempo and mode of evolution.

Authors:  W M Brown; E M Prager; A Wang; A C Wilson
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 2.395

9.  Drosophila melanogaster mitochondrial DNA: gene organization and evolutionary considerations.

Authors:  R Garesse
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Rates and patterns of scnDNA and mtDNA divergence within the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup.

Authors:  A Caccone; G D Amato; J R Powell
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  6 in total

1.  Neighboring base composition is strongly correlated with base substitution bias in a region of the chloroplast genome.

Authors:  B R Morton; M T Clegg
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.395

2.  Phylogenetic incongruence in the Drosophila melanogaster species group.

Authors:  Alex Wong; Jeffrey D Jensen; John E Pool; Charles F Aquadro
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2006-09-09       Impact factor: 4.286

3.  Speciation in the Artemia genus: mitochondrial DNA analysis of bisexual and parthenogenetic brine shrimps.

Authors:  M L Perez; J R Valverde; B Batuecas; F Amat; R Marco; R Garesse
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 2.395

4.  Molecular phylogeny of the Drosophila melanogaster species subgroup.

Authors:  Wen-Ya Ko; Ryan M David; Hiroshi Akashi
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.395

5.  Comparative genomics of Drosophila mtDNA: Novel features of conservation and change across functional domains and lineages.

Authors:  Kristi L Montooth; Dawn N Abt; Jeffrey W Hofmann; David M Rand
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 2.395

6.  Widespread discordance of gene trees with species tree in Drosophila: evidence for incomplete lineage sorting.

Authors:  Daniel A Pollard; Venky N Iyer; Alan M Moses; Michael B Eisen
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2006-08-28       Impact factor: 5.917

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.