BACKGROUND: Transport of mechanically ventilated patients in a combat zone presents challenges including conservation of resources. In the battlefield setting, the provision of adequate oxygen supplies remains a significant issue. Autonomous control of oxygen concentration may allow a reduction in mission load. METHODS:Trauma patients requiring ventilation and inspired oxygen concentration (FIO2) greater than 0.35 were evaluated for study. Patients were randomized to consecutive 4-hour periods of autonomous control or standard care. The system for autonomous control consisted of a ventilator, oximeter, and a portable computer. The portable computer housed the control algorithm and collected ventilator and oxygen saturation (SpO2) data every 5 seconds. The controller goal was to maintain SpO2 at 94% +/- 2% via discrete changes of 1% to 5%. Ventilator settings and SpO2 were recorded every 5 seconds for analysis. RESULTS:Fifteen patients were enrolled in this study. Oxygen saturation was maintained in the 92% to 96% saturation range 33% +/- 36% of the time during clinician control versus 83% +/- 21% during autonomous control. Oxygen usage was reduced by 44% during autonomous control. There was a slight difference in the total duration of SpO2 episodes less than 88% between groups (6.02 +/- 0.83 vs. 6.87 +/- 0.46 minutes, p < 0.05). There were no differences in the number of episodes of SpO2 <88%. CONCLUSION: Autonomous control of FIO2 offers the opportunity for a reduction in oxygen usage, allowing a weight and resource reduction, without increasing risk of hypoxemia in ventilated trauma patients.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Transport of mechanically ventilated patients in a combat zone presents challenges including conservation of resources. In the battlefield setting, the provision of adequate oxygen supplies remains a significant issue. Autonomous control of oxygen concentration may allow a reduction in mission load. METHODS:Traumapatients requiring ventilation and inspired oxygen concentration (FIO2) greater than 0.35 were evaluated for study. Patients were randomized to consecutive 4-hour periods of autonomous control or standard care. The system for autonomous control consisted of a ventilator, oximeter, and a portable computer. The portable computer housed the control algorithm and collected ventilator and oxygen saturation (SpO2) data every 5 seconds. The controller goal was to maintain SpO2 at 94% +/- 2% via discrete changes of 1% to 5%. Ventilator settings and SpO2 were recorded every 5 seconds for analysis. RESULTS: Fifteen patients were enrolled in this study. Oxygen saturation was maintained in the 92% to 96% saturation range 33% +/- 36% of the time during clinician control versus 83% +/- 21% during autonomous control. Oxygen usage was reduced by 44% during autonomous control. There was a slight difference in the total duration of SpO2 episodes less than 88% between groups (6.02 +/- 0.83 vs. 6.87 +/- 0.46 minutes, p < 0.05). There were no differences in the number of episodes of SpO2 <88%. CONCLUSION: Autonomous control of FIO2 offers the opportunity for a reduction in oxygen usage, allowing a weight and resource reduction, without increasing risk of hypoxemia in ventilated traumapatients.
Authors: Peter L Jernigan; Richard S Hoehn; Thomas C Blakeman; Judy Heyl; Bryce R H Robinson; Timothy A Pritts; Richard D Branson Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Date: 2015-07 Impact factor: 3.313