Literature DB >> 19204503

Comparison of new hemostatic granules/powders with currently deployed hemostatic products in a lethal model of extremity arterial hemorrhage in swine.

Bijan S Kheirabadi1, Jason W Edens, Irasema B Terrazas, J Scot Estep, Harold G Klemcke, Michael A Dubick, John B Holcomb.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: HemCon bandage (HC) and QuikClot granules (QC) have been deployed for the past 5 years for treating external hemorrhage in combat casualties. We examined efficacy and initial safety of three new hemostatic granules/powders in a swine extremity arterial hemorrhage model that was 100% fatal with army standard gauze treatment. The new products were compared with the most advanced forms of HC and QC products.
METHODS: Anesthetized pigs (37 kg, n = 46) were instrumented, splenectomized, and their femoral arteries were isolated and injured (6 mm arteriotomy). After 45 seconds free bleeding, a test agent [WoundStat (WS), super quick relief (SQR), Celox (CX)] or a control product [HC or QC bead bags (advanced clotting sponge plus)] was applied to the wounds and compressed with a large gauze for 2 minutes. Fluid resuscitation (colloid and crystalloid) was given and titrated to a mean arterial pressure of 65 mm Hg. Animals were observed for 180 minutes or until death. Computed tomography angiography was performed on survivors and tissue samples were collected form wounds for histologic examination.
RESULTS: No differences were found in baseline measurements and pretreatment blood loss (17.4 mL/kg +/- 0.5 mL/kg, mean +/- SEM) among groups. Advanced clotting sponge plus testing was halted after six unsuccessful attempts (no hemostasis observed) whereas other agents were tested each in 10 animals. Stable hemostasis was achieved in 10 (WS), 7 (SQR), 6 (CX), and 1 (HC) subjects in each group, resulting in the recovery of mean arterial pressure and survival of the animals for 3 hours (p < 0.05, SQR or WS vs. HC). Posttreatment blood loss was significantly reduced with the use of the new agents (CX = 40 +/- 16.6, SQR = 34.5 +/- 16.3, WS = 9.5 mL/kg +/- 5.2 mL/kg) as compared with HC (85.6 mL/kg +/- 10 mL/kg, p < 0.05). The granular treated animals lived for 180 (WS), 164 +/- 8.2 (SQR) and 138 +/- 17.7 (CX) minutes, significantly (p < 0.05) longer than the HC (83.3 +/- 12 minutes) group. A significant (p < 0.05) rise in temperature (53.5 degrees C +/- 1.8 degrees C) over baseline (36.5 degrees C +/- 0.3 degrees C) was measured only in the wounds treated with SQR. Computed tomography images showed no blood flow through treated vessels. Histologic evidence indicated the least tissue damage with HC, moderate damage with WS and CX, and most damage including axonal necrosis with SQR.
CONCLUSION: The new hemostatic agents are significantly more effective in treating arterial hemorrhage than currently deployed products. Among them, WS granules appear to be most efficacious, followed by SQR and CX powders. The clinical significance of tissue damage caused by these agents and any potential risk of embolism with procoagulant granular/powder products are unknown and warrant survival studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19204503     DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31819634a1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma        ISSN: 0022-5282


  21 in total

1.  The effects of QuikClot Combat Gauze on hemorrhage control in the presence of hemodilution and hypothermia.

Authors:  Don Johnson; Sheri Bates; Sofiya Nukalo; Amy Staub; Aaron Hines; Taylor Leishman; Jennifer Michel; Dusti Sikes; Brian Gegel; James Burgert
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2014-03-26

Review 2.  Topical and effective hemostatic medicines in the battlefield.

Authors:  Yin-Juan Zhang; Bo Gao; Xi-Wen Liu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-01-15

3.  Comparison of the topical haemostatic efficacy of nano-micro particles of clinoptilolite and kaolin in a rat model of haemorrhagic injury.

Authors:  A Bayır; M Eryılmaz; M Demirbilek; E B Denkbaş; I Arzıman; M Durusu
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2015-03-14       Impact factor: 3.693

4.  In vitro evaluation of the hyaluronic acid/alginate composite powder for topical haemostasis and wound healing.

Authors:  Yi-Wen Chen; Chia-Hsin Lu; Meng-Han Shen; Shih-Yeh Lin; Chia-Hui Chen; Ching-Kuang Chuang; Chia-Che Ho
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 5.  Hemostasis and nanotechnology.

Authors:  Patrick Hangge; Jonathan Stone; Hassan Albadawi; Yu Shrike Zhang; Ali Khademhosseini; Rahmi Oklu
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2017-12

Review 6.  [Approaches to pre-hospital bleeding management : Current overview on civilian emergency medicine].

Authors:  H Lier; M Bernhard; J Knapp; C Buschmann; I Bretschneider; B Hossfeld
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 1.041

7.  The long term immunological response of swine after two exposures to a salmon thrombin and fibrinogen hemostatic bandage.

Authors:  Stephen W Rothwell; Timothy Settle; Shannon Wallace; Jennifer Dorsey; David Simpson; James R Bowman; Paul Janmey; Evelyn Sawyer
Journal:  Biologicals       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 1.856

8.  A hydrogel sealant for the treatment of severe hepatic and aortic trauma with a dissolution feature for post-emergent care.

Authors:  Marlena D Konieczynska; Juan C Villa-Camacho; Cynthia Ghobril; Miguel Perez-Viloria; William A Blessing; Ara Nazarian; Edward K Rodriguez; Mark W Grinstaff
Journal:  Mater Horiz       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 13.266

9.  Hemostatic gauze based on chitosan and hydroquinone: preparation, characterization and blood coagulation evaluation.

Authors:  Roberta Cassano; Maria Luisa Di Gioia; Silvia Mellace; Nevio Picci; Sonia Trombino
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 10.  Biomaterials and Advanced Technologies for Hemostatic Management of Bleeding.

Authors:  DaShawn A Hickman; Christa L Pawlowski; Ujjal D S Sekhon; Joyann Marks; Anirban Sen Gupta
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 30.849

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.