Literature DB >> 19204501

Prognostic indicators and outcome prediction model for severe traumatic brain injury.

Osamu Tasaki1, Tadahiko Shiozaki, Toshimitsu Hamasaki, Kentaro Kajino, Haruhiko Nakae, Hiroshi Tanaka, Takeshi Shimazu, Hisashi Sugimoto.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although some predictive models for patient outcomes after severe traumatic brain injury have been proposed, a mathematical model with high predictive value has not been established. The purpose of the present study was to analyze the most important indicators of prognosis and to develop the best outcome prediction model.
METHODS: One hundred eleven consecutive patients with a Glasgow Coma Scale score of <9 were examined and 14 factors were evaluated. Intracranial pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure were recorded at admission to the intensive care unit. The absence of the basal cisterns, presence of extensive subarachnoid hemorrhage, and degree of midline shift were evaluated by means of computed tomography within 24 hours after injury. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent risk factors for a poor prognosis and to develop the best prediction model.
RESULTS: The best model included the following variables: age (p < 0.01), light reflex (p = 0.01), extensive subarachnoid hemorrhage (p = 0.01), intracranial pressure (p = 0.04), and midline shift (p = 0.12). Positive predictive value of the model was 97.3%, negative predictive value was 87.1%, and overall predictive value was 94.2%. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.977, and the p value for the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit was 0.866.
CONCLUSIONS: Our predictive model based on age, absence of light reflex, presence of extensive subarachnoid hemorrhage, intracranial pressure, and midline shift was shown to have high predictive value and will be useful for decision making, review of treatment, and family counseling in case of traumatic brain injury.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19204501     DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31815d9d3f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma        ISSN: 0022-5282


  9 in total

1.  Use of Rotterdam CT scores for mortality risk stratification in children with traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Kate Liesemer; Jay Riva-Cambrin; Kimberly Statler Bennett; Susan L Bratton; Henry Tran; Ryan R Metzger; Tellen D Bennett
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 3.624

2.  The profile of blunt traumatic supratentorial cranial bleed types.

Authors:  Aaron C Shpiner; Nikolay Bugaev; Ron Riesenburger; Isaac Ng; Janis L Breeze; Sandra S Arabian; Reuven Rabinovici
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 1.961

3.  The profile of blunt traumatic infratentorial cranial bleed types.

Authors:  Isaac Ng; Nikolay Bugaev; Ron Riesenburger; Aaron C Shpiner; Janis L Breeze; Sandra S Arabian; Reuven Rabinovici
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 1.961

4.  Outcome prediction model for severe traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Jiro Iba; Osamu Tasaki; Tomohito Hirao; Tomoyoshi Mohri; Kazuhisa Yoshiya; Koichi Hayakawa; Tadahiko Shiozaki; Toshimitsu Hamasaki; Yasushi Nakamori; Satoshi Fujimi; Hiroshi Ogura; Yasuyuki Kuwagata; Takeshi Shimazu
Journal:  Acute Med Surg       Date:  2013-10-29

Review 5.  Intracranial pressure monitoring: fundamental considerations and rationale for monitoring.

Authors:  Randall Chesnut; Walter Videtta; Paul Vespa; Peter Le Roux
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.210

Review 6.  Critical care management of severe traumatic brain injury in adults.

Authors:  Samir H Haddad; Yaseen M Arabi
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 2.953

7.  Measuring scales used for assessment of patients with traumatic brain injury: multicenter studies.

Authors:  Robert Ślusarz; Renata Jabłońska; Agnieszka Królikowska; Beata Haor; Ewa Barczykowska; Monika Biercewicz; Mariola Głowacka; Justyna Szrajda
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 2.711

8.  The aggressiveness of neurotrauma practitioners and the influence of the IMPACT prognostic calculator.

Authors:  Joshua Letsinger; Casey Rommel; Ryan Hirschi; Raminder Nirula; Gregory W J Hawryluk
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Yokukansan improves distress of medical staff, and cognitive function and motivation in patients with destructive and aggressive behaviors after traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Tomomichi Kan'o; Jing-Yan Han; Kuniaki Nakahara; Shingo Konno; Mayuko Shibata; Takao Kitahara; Kazui Soma
Journal:  Acute Med Surg       Date:  2014-03-05
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.