Literature DB >> 19204368

Results of arthroscopic revision anterior shoulder reconstruction.

Christopher J Barnes1, Mark H Getelman, Stephen J Snyder.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recurrent instability after surgical stabilization of the shoulder is uncommon. Although results of open revision stabilization procedures have been reported, only 3 studies have evaluated the outcome of arthroscopic revision surgery.
PURPOSE: To analyze results of arthroscopic revision anterior shoulder reconstruction at the authors' institution. STUDY
DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4.
METHODS: Chart review identified 18 shoulders that had arthroscopic revision anterior shoulder reconstruction at the Southern California Orthopedic Institute between November 4, 1997, and May 14, 2002. Anterior reconstruction of the shoulder was performed using suture anchors and nonabsorbable sutures. In most patients, posterior capsular plication was also performed; in 1 patient, closure of the rotator interval was performed. Sixteen shoulders in 15 patients were examined and 1 patient who required revision surgery was interviewed at a mean of 38 months (range, 24-67 months) after arthroscopic revision anterior shoulder reconstruction. The patient population consisted of 13 men and 3 women whose age at surgery was between 17 and 55 years (mean, 30 years; SD, 11.9 years). Patient satisfaction, the Simple Shoulder Test, and the Rowe scale were used to measure outcome.
RESULTS: Prior surgeries included 10 arthroscopic procedures in 9 shoulders and 10 open procedures in 8 shoulders. In this study group, 1 patient dislocated his shoulder 4 months after arthroscopic revision anterior shoulder reconstruction during an altercation and subsequently underwent a Bristow procedure. Of the remaining cases, none of the 16 shoulders had recurrence of dislocation or subluxation; all 15 patients were satisfied with their revision surgeries. Among this group, the Simple Shoulder Test responses improved from 8.3 yes responses to 11.3 after arthroscopic revision anterior shoulder reconstruction (P < .05). Using the Rowe scale, there were 9 excellent, 4 good, and 3 fair results. Mean Rowe score at follow-up was 83.8 (range, 55-100; SD, 14.7) for these 16 shoulders.
CONCLUSION: In this series, 94% of shoulders were stable after arthroscopic revision anterior shoulder reconstruction, and there were a high number of good and excellent outcomes. Results suggest arthroscopic revision anterior shoulder reconstruction using suture anchors is a viable treatment alternative for patients with failed anterior shoulder reconstructions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19204368     DOI: 10.1177/0363546508328411

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  15 in total

1.  Arthroscopic Bankart repair: Have we finally reached a gold standard?

Authors:  Alessandro Castagna; Raffaele Garofalo; Marco Conti; Brody Flanagin
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Is selective arthroscopic revision beneficial for treating recurrent anterior shoulder instability?

Authors:  Guillermo Arce; Francisco Arcuri; Diego Ferro; Enrique Pereira
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Can arthroscopic revision surgery for shoulder instability be a fair option?

Authors:  Silvana De Giorgi; Raffaele Garofalo; Silvio Tafuri; Eugenio Cesari; Giacomo Delle Rose; Alessandro Castagna
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2014-07-14

4.  Revision wrist arthroscopy after failed primary arthroscopic treatment.

Authors:  Eugene Jang; Jonathan R Danoff; Rebecca A Rajfer; Melvin P Rosenwasser
Journal:  J Wrist Surg       Date:  2014-02

Review 5.  Evaluation and treatment of failed shoulder instability procedures.

Authors:  Anthony G Ho; Ashok L Gowda; J Michael Wiater
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2016-06-15

6.  Revision anterior glenohumeral instability: is arthroscopic treatment an option?

Authors:  Dillon C O'Neill; Garrett Christensen; Jun Kawakami; Robert T Burks; Patrick E Greis; Robert Z Tashjian; Peter N Chalmers
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2020-05-07

7.  Is Revision Bankart Repair with Remplissage a Viable Option for Failed Bankart Repair in Non-contact Sports Person Aiming to Return to Sports?

Authors:  Skand Sinha; Nitin Mehta; Rakesh Goyal; Ankit Goyal; Deepak Joshi; R K Arya
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 1.251

Review 8.  How to Assess Shoulder Functionality: A Systematic Review of Existing Validated Outcome Measures.

Authors:  Rocio Aldon-Villegas; Carmen Ridao-Fernández; Dolores Torres-Enamorado; Gema Chamorro-Moriana
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-08

9.  The Rotator Interval of the Shoulder: Implications in the Treatment of Shoulder Instability.

Authors:  Rachel M Frank; Dean Taylor; Nikhil N Verma; Anthony A Romeo; Timothy S Mologne; Matthew T Provencher
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2015-12-29

10.  Evaluation and Management of Failed Shoulder Instability Surgery.

Authors:  António Cartucho; Nuno Moura; Marco Sarmento
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2017-08-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.