Literature DB >> 19204367

Cyclic loading of 3 Achilles tendon repairs simulating early postoperative forces.

Steven J Lee1, Michael J Sileo, Ian J Kremenic, Karl Orishimo, Simon Ben-Avi, Stephen J Nicholas, Malachy McHugh.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The abstract goes here and covers two columns. Accelerated rehabilitation has been advocated after Achilles tendon repair, but it produces significant forces at the repair site. The abstract goes here and covers two columns. HYPOTHESIS: Stresses applied to the repaired Achilles tendon simulating postoperative forces may exceed the strength of some repairs. STUDY
DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study.
METHODS: Fifteen Achilles tendons were incised 4 cm proximal to the calcaneal insertion, then were repaired using either a percutaneous, 4-strand Krackow, or an epitendinous augmented 4-strand Krackow technique. Tendons were cyclically loaded to 1000 cycles each at 100, 190, and 369 N. The number of cycles to initial gapping, 5-mm gapping, and total failure were compared using Mann-Whitney U tests with adjustments for multiple comparisons.
RESULTS: Gap resistance was significantly greater for augmented Krackow repairs (2208 cycles to initial gapping) versus nonaugmented repairs (502 cycles, P = .024) and for nonaugmented Krackow repairs versus percutaneous repairs (5 cycles, P = .024). All percutaneous repairs failed during the 100-N cycling (102 +/- 135 cycles). All nonaugmented Krackow repairs failed during the 190-N cycles (total cycles to failure: 1268 +/- 345). All augmented Krackow repairs were intact (no gapping) after the 190-N cycles. Four failed during 369-N cycling (total cycles to failure, 2017 +/- 11), and 1 remained intact for 3000 cycles.
CONCLUSION: Epitendinous cross-stitch weave augmentation of Achilles tendon repairs significantly increased repair strength and gap resistance. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Epitendinous cross-stitch weave augmentation of Achilles tendon repairs may better allow for early stretching and ambulation after Achilles tendon repair.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19204367     DOI: 10.1177/0363546508328595

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  13 in total

1.  Biomechanical properties of Achilles tendon repair augmented with a bioadhesive-coated scaffold.

Authors:  Michael Brodie; Laura Vollenweider; John L Murphy; Fangmin Xu; Arinne Lyman; William D Lew; Bruce P Lee
Journal:  Biomed Mater       Date:  2011-01-25       Impact factor: 3.715

2.  A biomechanical comparison of the primary stability of two minimally invasive techniques for repair of ruptured Achilles tendon.

Authors:  Umile Giuseppe Longo; Francisco Forriol; Stefano Campi; Nicola Maffulli; Vincenzo Denaro
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-01-07       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Clinical comparison of the two-stranded single and four-stranded double Krackow techniques for acute Achilles tendon ruptures.

Authors:  Gi Won Choi; Hak Jun Kim; Tae Hoon Lee; Se Hyun Park; Hee Seop Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Electromyographic analysis of the triceps surae muscle complex during achilles tendon rehabilitation program exercises.

Authors:  Michael Mullaney; Timothy F Tyler; Malachy McHugh; Karl Orishimo; Ian Kremenic; Jessica Caggiano; Abi Ramsey
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 3.843

Review 5.  Achilles tendon rupture: avoiding tendon lengthening during surgical repair and rehabilitation.

Authors:  Javier Maquirriain
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  2011-09

6.  Bunnell or cross-lock Bunnell suture for tendon repair? Defining the biomechanical role of suture pretension.

Authors:  Martin C Jordan; Stefanie Hoelscher-Doht; Kai Fehske; Fabian Gilbert; Hendrik Jansen; Rainer H Meffert
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 2.359

7.  Suture-Only Repair Versus Suture Anchor-Augmented Repair for Achilles Tendon Ruptures With a Short Distal Stump: A Biomechanical Comparison.

Authors:  Michael A Boin; Matthew A Dorweiler; Christopher J McMellen; Gregory C Gould; Richard T Laughlin
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2017-01-04

8.  Tendon end separation with loading in an Achilles tendon repair model: comparison of non-absorbable vs. absorbable sutures.

Authors:  Michael R Carmont; Jan Herman Kuiper; Karin Grävare Silbernagel; Jón Karlsson; Katarina Nilsson-Helander
Journal:  J Exp Orthop       Date:  2017-07-21

9.  Biomechanical Head-to-Head Comparison of 2 Sutures and the Giftbox Versus Bunnell Techniques for Midsubstance Achilles Tendon Ruptures.

Authors:  Rufus O Van Dyke; Sejul A Chaudhary; Gregory Gould; Roman Trimba; Richard T Laughlin
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2017-05-30

10.  Biomechanical Comparison of Panda Rope Bridge Technique and Other Minimally Invasive Achilles Tendon Repair Techniques In Vitro.

Authors:  Ting Wang; Yuan Mu; Yulei Diao; Wenke Liu; Yahong Wu; Zhuoqun Wang; Yanfeng Luo; Yangli Xie; Liangjun Yin
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-06-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.