PURPOSE: Optimal therapy of follicular lymphoma (FL) is not defined. We analyzed a large prospective cohort study to identify current demographics and patterns of care of FL in the United States. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The National LymphoCare Study is a multicenter, longitudinal, observational study designed to collect information on treatment regimens and outcomes for patients with newly diagnosed FL in the United States. Patients were enrolled between 2004 and 2007. There is no study-specific prescribed treatment regimen or intervention. RESULTS: Two thousand seven hundred twenty-eight subjects were enrolled at 265 sites, including the 80% of patients enrolled from nonacademic sites. Using the Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI), three distinct groups independent of histologic grade could be defined. Initial therapeutic strategy was: observation, 17.7%; rituximab monotherapy, 13.9%; clinical trial 6.1%; radiation therapy, 5.6%; chemotherapy only, 3.2%; chemotherapy plus rituximab, 51.9%. Chemotherapy plus rituximab regimens were: rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone, 55.0%; rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone, 23.1%; rituximab plus fludarabine based, 15.5%; other, 6.4%. The choice to initiate therapy rather than observe was associated with age, FLIPI, stage, and grade (P < .01). Significant differences in treatment (P < .01) across regions of the United States were noted. Contrary to practice guidelines, treatment of stage I FL frequently omits radiation therapy. CONCLUSION: Widely disparate therapeutic approaches are utilized for FL. Initial therapy is deferred in a small subset of patients. There is no single standard of care for the treatment of de novo FL, although antibody use is ubiquitous when therapy is initiated. These disparate approaches to the initial care of patients with FL render a heterogeneous group of patients at relapse.
PURPOSE: Optimal therapy of follicular lymphoma (FL) is not defined. We analyzed a large prospective cohort study to identify current demographics and patterns of care of FL in the United States. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The National LymphoCare Study is a multicenter, longitudinal, observational study designed to collect information on treatment regimens and outcomes for patients with newly diagnosed FL in the United States. Patients were enrolled between 2004 and 2007. There is no study-specific prescribed treatment regimen or intervention. RESULTS: Two thousand seven hundred twenty-eight subjects were enrolled at 265 sites, including the 80% of patients enrolled from nonacademic sites. Using the Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI), three distinct groups independent of histologic grade could be defined. Initial therapeutic strategy was: observation, 17.7%; rituximab monotherapy, 13.9%; clinical trial 6.1%; radiation therapy, 5.6%; chemotherapy only, 3.2%; chemotherapy plus rituximab, 51.9%. Chemotherapy plus rituximab regimens were: rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone, 55.0%; rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone, 23.1%; rituximab plus fludarabine based, 15.5%; other, 6.4%. The choice to initiate therapy rather than observe was associated with age, FLIPI, stage, and grade (P < .01). Significant differences in treatment (P < .01) across regions of the United States were noted. Contrary to practice guidelines, treatment of stage I FL frequently omits radiation therapy. CONCLUSION: Widely disparate therapeutic approaches are utilized for FL. Initial therapy is deferred in a small subset of patients. There is no single standard of care for the treatment of de novo FL, although antibody use is ubiquitous when therapy is initiated. These disparate approaches to the initial care of patients with FL render a heterogeneous group of patients at relapse.
Authors: P N Lara; R Higdon; N Lim; K Kwan; M Tanaka; D H Lau; T Wun; J Welborn; F J Meyers; S Christensen; R O'Donnell; C Richman; S A Scudder; J Tuscano; D R Gandara; K S Lam Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2001-03-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Electra D Paskett; M Robert Cooper; Nancy Stark; Thomas C Ricketts; Sara Tropman; Teresa Hatzell; Tim Aldrich; James Atkins Journal: Cancer Pract Date: 2002 Jan-Feb
Authors: Robert S Mannel; Joan L Walker; Natalie Gould; Dennis R Scribner; Scott Kamelle; Todd Tillmanns; D Scott McMeekin; Michael A Gold Journal: Am J Clin Oncol Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 2.339
Authors: Michael S Simon; Wei Du; Lawrence Flaherty; Philip A Philip; Patricia Lorusso; Cheryl Miree; Daryn Smith; Diane R Brown Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2004-04-13 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: K M Ardeshna; P Smith; A Norton; B W Hancock; P J Hoskin; K A MacLennan; R E Marcus; A Jelliffe; G Vaughan; D C Linch Journal: Lancet Date: 2003-08-16 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: S Montoto; A López-Guillermo; A Ferrer; M Camós; A Alvarez-Larrán; F Bosch; J Bladé; F Cervantes; J Esteve; F Cobo; D Colomer; E Campo; E Montserrat Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Daryl Tan; Sandra J Horning; Richard T Hoppe; Ronald Levy; Saul A Rosenberg; Bronislava M Sigal; Roger A Warnke; Yasodha Natkunam; Summer S Han; Alan Yuen; Sylvia K Plevritis; Ranjana H Advani Journal: Blood Date: 2013-06-18 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Kami Maddocks; Paul M Barr; Bruce D Cheson; Richard F Little; Lawrence Baizer; Brad S Kahl; John P Leonard; Nathan Fowler; Leo I Gordon; Brian K Link; Jonathan W Friedberg; Stephen M Ansell Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2016-12-31 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Nina D Wagner-Johnston; Brian K Link; Michelle Byrtek; Keith L Dawson; John Hainsworth; Christopher R Flowers; Jonathan W Friedberg; Nancy L Bartlett Journal: Blood Date: 2015-06-23 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Ida Wong-Sefidan; Michelle Byrtek; Xiaolei Zhou; Jonathan W Friedberg; Christopher R Flowers; Andrew D Zelenetz; Keith L Dawson; Erin Reid Journal: Leuk Lymphoma Date: 2016-08-12