Literature DB >> 19204203

Follicular lymphoma in the United States: first report of the national LymphoCare study.

Jonathan W Friedberg1, Michael D Taylor, James R Cerhan, Christopher R Flowers, Hildy Dillon, Charles M Farber, Eric S Rogers, John D Hainsworth, Elaine K Wong, Julie M Vose, Andrew D Zelenetz, Brian K Link.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Optimal therapy of follicular lymphoma (FL) is not defined. We analyzed a large prospective cohort study to identify current demographics and patterns of care of FL in the United States. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The National LymphoCare Study is a multicenter, longitudinal, observational study designed to collect information on treatment regimens and outcomes for patients with newly diagnosed FL in the United States. Patients were enrolled between 2004 and 2007. There is no study-specific prescribed treatment regimen or intervention.
RESULTS: Two thousand seven hundred twenty-eight subjects were enrolled at 265 sites, including the 80% of patients enrolled from nonacademic sites. Using the Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI), three distinct groups independent of histologic grade could be defined. Initial therapeutic strategy was: observation, 17.7%; rituximab monotherapy, 13.9%; clinical trial 6.1%; radiation therapy, 5.6%; chemotherapy only, 3.2%; chemotherapy plus rituximab, 51.9%. Chemotherapy plus rituximab regimens were: rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone, 55.0%; rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone, 23.1%; rituximab plus fludarabine based, 15.5%; other, 6.4%. The choice to initiate therapy rather than observe was associated with age, FLIPI, stage, and grade (P < .01). Significant differences in treatment (P < .01) across regions of the United States were noted. Contrary to practice guidelines, treatment of stage I FL frequently omits radiation therapy.
CONCLUSION: Widely disparate therapeutic approaches are utilized for FL. Initial therapy is deferred in a small subset of patients. There is no single standard of care for the treatment of de novo FL, although antibody use is ubiquitous when therapy is initiated. These disparate approaches to the initial care of patients with FL render a heterogeneous group of patients at relapse.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19204203      PMCID: PMC2738614          DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2008.18.1495

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  35 in total

1.  Oncologist's role critical to clinical trial enrollment.

Authors:  R Finn
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-10-18       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 2.  Follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: the role of radiation therapy.

Authors:  P Mauch
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.673

3.  Barriers to clinical trial enrollment: are state mandates the solution?

Authors:  Bruce E Hillner
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2004-07-21       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Prospective evaluation of cancer clinical trial accrual patterns: identifying potential barriers to enrollment.

Authors:  P N Lara; R Higdon; N Lim; K Kwan; M Tanaka; D H Lau; T Wun; J Welborn; F J Meyers; S Christensen; R O'Donnell; C Richman; S A Scudder; J Tuscano; D R Gandara; K S Lam
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-03-15       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Clinical trial enrollment of rural patients with cancer.

Authors:  Electra D Paskett; M Robert Cooper; Nancy Stark; Thomas C Ricketts; Sara Tropman; Teresa Hatzell; Tim Aldrich; James Atkins
Journal:  Cancer Pract       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb

6.  Impact of individual physicians on enrollment of patients into clinical trials.

Authors:  Robert S Mannel; Joan L Walker; Natalie Gould; Dennis R Scribner; Scott Kamelle; Todd Tillmanns; D Scott McMeekin; Michael A Gold
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.339

7.  Factors associated with breast cancer clinical trials participation and enrollment at a large academic medical center.

Authors:  Michael S Simon; Wei Du; Lawrence Flaherty; Philip A Philip; Patricia Lorusso; Cheryl Miree; Daryn Smith; Diane R Brown
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-04-13       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Long-term effect of a watch and wait policy versus immediate systemic treatment for asymptomatic advanced-stage non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  K M Ardeshna; P Smith; A Norton; B W Hancock; P J Hoskin; K A MacLennan; R E Marcus; A Jelliffe; G Vaughan; D C Linch
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-08-16       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Survival after progression in patients with follicular lymphoma: analysis of prognostic factors.

Authors:  S Montoto; A López-Guillermo; A Ferrer; M Camós; A Alvarez-Larrán; F Bosch; J Bladé; F Cervantes; J Esteve; F Cobo; D Colomer; E Campo; E Montserrat
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 32.976

10.  Stage I and II follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: long-term follow-up of no initial therapy.

Authors:  Ranjana Advani; Saul A Rosenberg; Sandra J Horning
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-03-15       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  79 in total

1.  The value of observational cohort studies for cancer drugs.

Authors:  David R Spigel
Journal:  Biotechnol Healthc       Date:  2010

2.  Chemotherapy: maintenance rituximab for relapsed follicular lymphoma.

Authors:  David Wrench; Silvia Montoto
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 66.675

3.  A case of an abdominal mass: follicular lymphoma.

Authors:  Tina L Walker; Gabriel E Lopez
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2011

4.  Improvements in observed and relative survival in follicular grade 1-2 lymphoma during 4 decades: the Stanford University experience.

Authors:  Daryl Tan; Sandra J Horning; Richard T Hoppe; Ronald Levy; Saul A Rosenberg; Bronislava M Sigal; Roger A Warnke; Yasodha Natkunam; Summer S Han; Alan Yuen; Sylvia K Plevritis; Ranjana H Advani
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 5.  Recommendations for Clinical Trial Development in Follicular Lymphoma.

Authors:  Kami Maddocks; Paul M Barr; Bruce D Cheson; Richard F Little; Lawrence Baizer; Brad S Kahl; John P Leonard; Nathan Fowler; Leo I Gordon; Brian K Link; Jonathan W Friedberg; Stephen M Ansell
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2016-12-31       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 6.  Rituximab in indolent lymphomas.

Authors:  Tarek Sousou; Jonathan Friedberg
Journal:  Semin Hematol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.851

Review 7.  Follicular Lymphoma: Past, Present, and Future.

Authors:  Melody R Becnel; Loretta J Nastoupil
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2018-05-24

8.  Outcomes of transformed follicular lymphoma in the modern era: a report from the National LymphoCare Study (NLCS).

Authors:  Nina D Wagner-Johnston; Brian K Link; Michelle Byrtek; Keith L Dawson; John Hainsworth; Christopher R Flowers; Jonathan W Friedberg; Nancy L Bartlett
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 22.113

9.  [18F] Positron emission tomography response after rituximab-containing induction therapy in follicular lymphoma is an independent predictor of survival after adjustment for FLIPI in academic and community-based practice.

Authors:  Ida Wong-Sefidan; Michelle Byrtek; Xiaolei Zhou; Jonathan W Friedberg; Christopher R Flowers; Andrew D Zelenetz; Keith L Dawson; Erin Reid
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2016-08-12

Review 10.  Next-generation prognostic assessment for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Authors:  Ashley D Staton; Jean L Koff; Qiushi Chen; Turgay Ayer; Christopher R Flowers
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 3.404

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.