J Conley1, M Jordan, W A Ghali. 1. Centre for Health and Policy Studies, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the proportion of consultations requested by general internal medicine services that communicate key components of the consultation process to medical subspecialists. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review by two researchers, using a standardised chart abstraction instrument (93.1% agreement, kappa 0.85). SETTING: Calgary, Alberta, Canada. SAMPLE: A random sample of medical consultations was selected from those generated on two medical teaching units (MTUs) from 2003 to 2004. MEASUREMENTS: The primary measure of interest was whether a "clear clinical question" was posed to the subspecialist, a binary variable. RESULTS: Two hundred consultations were sampled from the 2885 subspecialty consultations. Of the selected consultations, 94.0% (188/200) were available for review. A clear clinical question was posed in 69.7% (131/188) of consultations (CI 0.63 to 0.74). In a secondary analysis involving a larger sample permitting comparison across subspecialties, 95.1% (368/387) of the consultations, representative of the subspecialties, were available for review. An MTU member contacted the subspecialist for 74.2% of consultations. If a consultation was urgent, a member of the MTU contacted the subspecialist in 81.0% of consultations. Of these urgent consultations, 63.3% had a clear clinical question. CONCLUSION: More than one in four consultations does not contain a clear clinical question, illustrating suboptimal communication between physicians. Innovative strategies that provide a sustainable solution for overcoming barriers to communication could have a significant impact on quality of care.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the proportion of consultations requested by general internal medicine services that communicate key components of the consultation process to medical subspecialists. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review by two researchers, using a standardised chart abstraction instrument (93.1% agreement, kappa 0.85). SETTING: Calgary, Alberta, Canada. SAMPLE: A random sample of medical consultations was selected from those generated on two medical teaching units (MTUs) from 2003 to 2004. MEASUREMENTS: The primary measure of interest was whether a "clear clinical question" was posed to the subspecialist, a binary variable. RESULTS: Two hundred consultations were sampled from the 2885 subspecialty consultations. Of the selected consultations, 94.0% (188/200) were available for review. A clear clinical question was posed in 69.7% (131/188) of consultations (CI 0.63 to 0.74). In a secondary analysis involving a larger sample permitting comparison across subspecialties, 95.1% (368/387) of the consultations, representative of the subspecialties, were available for review. An MTU member contacted the subspecialist for 74.2% of consultations. If a consultation was urgent, a member of the MTU contacted the subspecialist in 81.0% of consultations. Of these urgent consultations, 63.3% had a clear clinical question. CONCLUSION: More than one in four consultations does not contain a clear clinical question, illustrating suboptimal communication between physicians. Innovative strategies that provide a sustainable solution for overcoming barriers to communication could have a significant impact on quality of care.
Authors: Hardeep Singh; Adol Esquivel; Dean F Sittig; Daniel Murphy; Himabindu Kadiyala; Rachel Schiesser; Donna Espadas; Laura A Petersen Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2010-09-17 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Michael L Barnett; Ateev Mehrotra; Joseph P Frolkis; Melissa Spinks; Casey Steiger; Brandon Hehir; Jeffrey O Greenberg; Hardeep Singh Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2016-03 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Jennifer P Stevens; David Nyweide; Sha Maresh; Alan Zaslavsky; William Shrank; Michael D Howell; Bruce E Landon Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2015-02-19 Impact factor: 5.128