Literature DB >> 19203941

Seasonal changes in depth of water uptake for encroaching trees Juniperus virginiana and Pinus ponderosa and two dominant C4 grasses in a semiarid grassland.

Kathleen D Eggemeyer1, Tala Awada, F Edwin Harvey, David A Wedin, Xinhua Zhou, C William Zanner.   

Abstract

We used the natural abundance of stable isotopic ratios of hydrogen and oxygen in soil (0.05-3 m depth), plant xylem and precipitation to determine the seasonal changes in sources of soil water uptake by two native encroaching woody species (Pinus ponderosa P. & C. Lawson, Juniperus virginiana L.), and two C(4) grasses (Schizachyrium scoparium (Michx.) Nash, Panicum virgatum L.), in the semiarid Sandhills grasslands of Nebraska. Grass species extracted most of their water from the upper soil profile (0.05-0.5 m). Soil water uptake from below 0.5 m depth increased under drought, but appeared to be minimal in relation to the total water use of these species. The grasses senesced in late August in response to drought conditions. In contrast to grasses, P. ponderosa and J. virginiana trees exhibited significant plasticity in sources of water uptake. In winter, tree species extracted a large fraction of their soil water from below 0.9 m depth. In spring when shallow soil water was available, tree species used water from the upper soil profile (0.05-0.5 m) and relied little on water from below 0.5 m depth. During the growing season (May-August) significant differences between the patterns of tree species water uptake emerged. Pinus ponderosa acquired a large fraction of its water from the 0.05-0.5 and 0.5-0.9 m soil profiles. Compared with P. ponderosa, J. virginiana acquired water from the 0.05-0.5 m profile during the early growing season but the amount extracted from this profile progressively declined between May and August and was mirrored by a progressive increase in the fraction taken up from 0.5-0.9 m depth, showing plasticity in tracking the general increase in soil water content within the 0.5-0.9 m profile, and being less responsive to growing season precipitation events. In September, soil water content declined to its minimum, and both tree species shifted soil water uptake to below 0.9 m. Tree transpiration rates (E) and water potentials (Psi) indicated that deep water sources did not maintain E which sharply declined in September, but played an important role in the recovery of tree Psi. Differences in sources of water uptake among these species and their ecological implications on tree-grass dynamics and soil water in semiarid environments are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19203941     DOI: 10.1093/treephys/tpn019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tree Physiol        ISSN: 0829-318X            Impact factor:   4.196


  19 in total

1.  Root distribution of Nitraria sibirica with seasonally varying water sources in a desert habitat.

Authors:  Hai Zhou; Wenzhi Zhao; Xinjun Zheng; Shoujuan Li
Journal:  J Plant Res       Date:  2015-05-24       Impact factor: 2.629

2.  New perspective on spring vegetation phenology and global climate change based on Tibetan Plateau tree-ring data.

Authors:  Bao Yang; Minhui He; Vladimir Shishov; Ivan Tychkov; Eugene Vaganov; Sergio Rossi; Fredrik Charpentier Ljungqvist; Achim Bräuning; Jussi Grießinger
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  No shift to a deeper water uptake depth in response to summer drought of two lowland and sub-alpine C₃-grasslands in Switzerland.

Authors:  Ulrich E Prechsl; Susanne Burri; Anna K Gilgen; Ansgar Kahmen; Nina Buchmann
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Phenotypic integration and life history strategies among populations of Pinus halepensis: an insight through structural equation modelling.

Authors:  Filippo Santini; José M Climent; Jordi Voltas
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 4.357

5.  Water sources of plant uptake along a salt marsh flooding gradient.

Authors:  Regine Redelstein; Heinz Coners; Alexander Knohl; Christoph Leuschner
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Response of dominant grass and shrub species to water manipulation: an ecophysiological basis for shrub invasion in a Chihuahuan Desert grassland.

Authors:  Heather L Throop; Lara G Reichmann; Osvaldo E Sala; Steven R Archer
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2011-12-11       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Global separation of plant transpiration from groundwater and streamflow.

Authors:  Jaivime Evaristo; Scott Jasechko; Jeffrey J McDonnell
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Hydraulic traits of co-existing conifers do not correlate with local hydroclimate condition: a case study in the northern Rocky Mountains, U.S.A.

Authors:  Tim Clute; Justin Martin; Nate Looker; Jia Hu
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Halophytes Differ in Their Adaptation to Soil Environment in the Yellow River Delta: Effects of Water Source, Soil Depth, and Nutrient Stoichiometry.

Authors:  Tian Li; Jingkuan Sun; Zhanyong Fu
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 5.753

Review 10.  Walter's two-layer hypothesis revisited: back to the roots!

Authors:  David Ward; Kerstin Wiegand; Stephan Getzin
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-12-25       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.