Literature DB >> 19203919

The scleritome of Paterimitra: an Early Cambrian stem group brachiopod from South Australia.

Christian B Skovsted1, Lars E Holmer, Cecilia M Larsson, Anette E S Högström, Glenn A Brock, Timothy P Topper, Uwe Balthasar, Sandra Petterson Stolk, John R Paterson.   

Abstract

Early Cambrian tommotiids are problematic fossil metazoans with external organophosphatic sclerites that have been considered to be basal members of the lophophorate stem group. Tommotiids are almost exclusively known from isolated or rarely fused individual sclerites, which made previous reconstructions of the actual organism highly conjectural. However, the recent discovery of the first articulated specimens of the tommotiid Eccentrotheca revealed a tubular sclerite arrangement (scleritome) that limited the possible life habit to sessile filter feeding and thus further supported a lophophorate affinity. Here, we report the first articulated specimens of a second tommotiid taxon, Paterimitra from the Early Cambrian of the Arrowie Basin, South Australia. Articulated specimens of Paterimitra are composed of two bilaterally symmetrical sclerite types and an unresolved number of small, asymmetrical and irregular crescent-shaped sclerites that attached to the anterior margin of the symmetrical sclerites. Together, the sclerites form an open cone in which the symmetrical sclerites are joined together and form a small posterior opening near the base of the scleritome, while the irregular crescent-shaped sclerites defined a broad anterior opening. The coniform scleritome of Paterimitra is interpreted to have attached to hard substrates via a pedicle that emerged through the small posterior opening (sometimes forming a tube) and was probably a sessile filter feeder. The scleritome of Paterimitra can be derived from the tubular scleritome of Eccentrotheca by modification of basal sclerites and reduction in tube height, and probably represents a more derived member of the brachiopod stem group with the paired symmetrical sclerites possibly homologous to brachiopod valves.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19203919      PMCID: PMC2660981          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2008.1655

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  7 in total

Review 1.  A critical reappraisal of the fossil record of the bilaterian phyla.

Authors:  G E Budd; S Jensen
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2000-05

2.  Why are arthropods segmented?

Authors:  G E Budd
Journal:  Evol Dev       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.930

3.  Broad phylogenomic sampling improves resolution of the animal tree of life.

Authors:  Casey W Dunn; Andreas Hejnol; David Q Matus; Kevin Pang; William E Browne; Stephen A Smith; Elaine Seaver; Greg W Rouse; Matthias Obst; Gregory D Edgecombe; Martin V Sørensen; Steven H D Haddock; Andreas Schmidt-Rhaesa; Akiko Okusu; Reinhardt Møbjerg Kristensen; Ward C Wheeler; Mark Q Martindale; Gonzalo Giribet
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-03-05       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Phylogenomic analyses of lophophorates (brachiopods, phoronids and bryozoans) confirm the Lophotrochozoa concept.

Authors:  Martin Helmkampf; Iris Bruchhaus; Bernhard Hausdorf
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  The Early Cambrian tommotiid Micrina, a sessile bivalved stem group brachiopod.

Authors:  Lars E Holmer; Christian B Skovsted; Glenn A Brock; James L Valentine; John R Paterson
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2008-12-23       Impact factor: 3.703

6.  Complete nucleotide sequences of mitochondrial genomes of two solitary entoprocts, Loxocorone allax and Loxosomella aloxiata: implications for lophotrochozoan phylogeny.

Authors:  Shin-ichi Yokobori; Tohru Iseto; Shuichi Asakawa; Takashi Sasaki; Nobuyoshi Shimizu; Akihiko Yamagishi; Tairo Oshima; Euichi Hirose
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 4.286

7.  Lophotrochozoan phylogeny assessed with LSU and SSU data: evidence of lophophorate polyphyly.

Authors:  Yale Passamaneck; Kenneth M Halanych
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2006-03-23       Impact factor: 4.286

  7 in total
  6 in total

1.  A soft-bodied lophophorate from the Silurian of England.

Authors:  M D Sutton; D E G Briggs; David J Siveter; Derek J Siveter
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Gene Expression Patterns in Brachiopod Larvae Refute the "Brachiopod-Fold" Hypothesis.

Authors:  Andreas Altenburger; Pedro Martinez; Graham E Budd; Lars E Holmer
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2017-08-22

3.  A sclerite-bearing stem group entoproct from the early Cambrian and its implications.

Authors:  Zhifei Zhang; Lars E Holmer; Christian B Skovsted; Glenn A Brock; Graham E Budd; Dongjing Fu; Xingliang Zhang; Degan Shu; Jian Han; Jianni Liu; Haizhou Wang; Aodhán Butler; Guoxiang Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  An early Cambrian agglutinated tubular lophophorate with brachiopod characters.

Authors:  Z-F Zhang; G-X Li; L E Holmer; G A Brock; U Balthasar; C B Skovsted; D-J Fu; X-L Zhang; H-Z Wang; A Butler; Z-L Zhang; C-Q Cao; J Han; J-N Liu; D-G Shu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  A chancelloriid-like metazoan from the early Cambrian Chengjiang Lagerstätte, China.

Authors:  Xianguang Hou; Mark Williams; David J Siveter; Derek J Siveter; Sarah Gabbott; David Holwell; Thomas H P Harvey
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Ediacaran skeletal metazoan interpreted as a lophophorate.

Authors:  A Yu Zhuravlev; R A Wood; A M Penny
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.