Literature DB >> 19203894

An open-label clinical trial evaluating safety and pharmacokinetics of two dosing schedules of panitumumab in patients with solid tumors.

Joe J Stephenson1, Charles Gregory, Howard Burris, Tim Larson, Udit Verma, Allen Cohn, Jeffrey Crawford, Roger B Cohen, Julie Martin, Peggy Lum, Xinqun Yang, Rafael G Amado.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study evaluated safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of 2 dose schedules and 2 infusion times of panitumumab in patients with advanced solid malignancies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This phase I multicenter, open-label study sequentially enrolled patients with advanced solid tumors refractory to standard therapy, or for which no standard therapy exists, to receive panitumumab 6 mg/kg every 2 weeks or 9 mg/kg every 3 weeks. Patients receiving panitumumab every 2 weeks received either all infusions over 60 minutes or a 60-minute infusion for the first dose followed by 30-minute infusions if the first infusion was well tolerated. Patients in the every-3-week cohort received 60-minute infusions. Safety outcomes included the incidence of adverse events and antipanitumumab antibody formation. Pharmacokinetic properties were determined. Efficacy endpoints included response rate and duration of response.
RESULTS: Eighty-six patients were enrolled; 84 (98%) received panitumumab. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 90% of patients. Safety profiles were similar between patients receiving 30-minute (n = 20) and 60-minute (n = 43) infusions every 2 weeks and patients receiving panitumumab every 3 weeks (n = 21). Panitumumab exposure at steady state increased dose proportionally, and peak serum concentrations were similar in patients receiving either 30- or 60-minute infusions every 2 weeks. Objective responses were seen in 4 patients (5%) with colon, rectal, esophageal, and bladder cancers.
CONCLUSION: Similar drug exposures and safety profiles were observed in patients receiving panitumumab 6 mg/kg every 2 weeks with either 30- or 60-minute infusions and antitumor activity was seen in some patients. Exposure increased approximately dose proportionally at steady state.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19203894     DOI: 10.3816/CCC.2009.n.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Colorectal Cancer        ISSN: 1533-0028            Impact factor:   4.481


  15 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic perspectives on the clinical drug development of panitumumab.

Authors:  Bing-Bing Yang; Peggy Lum; Alin Chen; Rosalin Arends; Lorin Roskos; Brian Smith; Juan José Pérez Ruixo
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 2.  Folliculitis induced by EGFR inhibitors, preventive and curative efficacy of tetracyclines in the management and incidence rates according to the type of EGFR inhibitor administered: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Jean-Baptiste Bachet; Lucie Peuvrel; Claude Bachmeyer; Ziad Reguiai; Pierre A Gourraud; Olivier Bouché; Marc Ychou; Rene J Bensadoun; Brigitte Dreno; Thierry André
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2012-03-16

Review 3.  Panitumumab: a review of its use in metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Gillian M Keating
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 4.  Panitumumab in the management of patients with KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Christopher M Hocking; Timothy J Price
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.409

5.  Consensus recommendations for the use of anti-egfr therapies in metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  C Cripps; S Gill; S Ahmed; B Colwell; S Dowden; H Kennecke; J Maroun; B Samson; M Thirlwell; R Wong
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.677

6.  On biomarkers and pathways in rectal cancer: What's the target?

Authors:  Gabriele Zoppoli; Valter Ferrando; Stefano Scabini
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-12-27

7.  Efficacy of the monoclonal antibody EGFR inhibitors for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  M Fakih; R Wong
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.677

8.  Pharmacokinetics and safety of panitumumab in a patient with chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  L L Krens; J M Baas; H J Guchelaar; H Gelderblom
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 9.  Treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: focus on panitumumab.

Authors:  Rebecca Y Tay; Rachel Wong; Eliza A Hawkes
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 3.989

Review 10.  Profile of panitumumab as first-line treatment in patients with wild-type KRAS metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Shiven B Patel; David Gill; Ignacio Garrido-Laguna
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.