Literature DB >> 19203308

Population rates of bone densitometry use in Australia, 2001-2005, by sex and rural versus urban location.

Dan P Ewald1, John A Eisman, Ben D Ewald, Tania M Winzenberg, Markus J Seibel, Peter R Ebeling, Leon A Flicker, Peter T Nash.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore use of bone densitometry in Australia and to identify any sex and geographic differences, as a marker of osteoporosis diagnosis and care. DESIGN AND
SETTING: Analysis of claims data from Medicare Australia in patients aged over 45 years during the period 2001-2005. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Age-standardised rates of bone densitometry use, by sex and by metropolitan, rural or remote classification.
RESULTS: Bone densitometry use increased by 26% over the 5 years. Rates were lower for rural and remote populations, with people in capital cities about three times as likely to undergo the investigation as those in remote areas. The sex ratio for the rate of bone densitometry use (women to men) decreased from more than 6 : 1 in 2001 to 4 : 1 in 2005.
CONCLUSION: Although the sex ratio for osteoporotic fracture is close to 2 : 1 (women to men), the sex ratio for testing is much higher, suggesting underuse of bone densitometry in men. Sex and rural inequities in use of the investigation need to be addressed as part of a national approach to reducing minimal trauma fracture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19203308

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Aust        ISSN: 0025-729X            Impact factor:   7.738


  5 in total

1.  Secondary prevention of osteoporosis in Australia: analysis of government-dispensed prescription data.

Authors:  Samantha A Hollingworth; Inong Gunanti; Lisa M Nissen; Emma L Duncan
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 3.923

2.  Pattern of use of DXA scans in men: a cross-sectional, population-based study.

Authors:  M Frost; C Gudex; K H Rubin; K Brixen; B Abrahamsen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-02-26       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Validity of self-reported osteoporosis in mid-age and older women.

Authors:  G M E E Peeters; S E Tett; A J Dobson; G D Mishra
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Bone density testing: an under-utilised and under-researched health education tool for osteoporosis prevention?

Authors:  Tania Winzenberg; Brian Oldenburg; Graeme Jones
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 5.717

5.  Validity of Self-Reported Diagnosis of Osteoporosis in Japan Nurses' Health Study.

Authors:  Takumi Kurabayashi; Yuki Ideno; Kazue Nagai; Naho Maruoka; Kiyoshi Takamatsu; Toshiyuki Yasui; Kunihiko Hayashi
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 4.790

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.