Literature DB >> 19203209

Reliability of cutaneous electrical perceptual threshold in the assessment of sensory perception in patients with spinal cord injury.

Nicolas K K King1, Gordana Savic, Hans Frankel, Ali Jamous, Peter H Ellaway.   

Abstract

The electrical perceptual threshold (EPT) test complements the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) assessment of cutaneous sensory function by providing a quantitative assessment for each dermatome. The aim here was to establish the reliability of the EPT by examining inter- and intra-rater repeatability of test results in spinal cord injury (SCI). Twelve persons with incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI; two stable at >20 months and 10 sub-acute at <9 months post-injury) and 12 control subjects took part. EPT was established at the ASIA sensory key points. A pulse of 0.5 ms in duration was applied three times per second. Threshold was determined by the method of limits. The strength of stimulation was augmented (0.1 mA.s(-1)) until the recipient reported sensation, then reduced until sensation was lost. EPT was taken as the lowest strength at which the subject reported sensation. Threshold was determined by two raters to establish intra- and inter-rater reliability. There were no significant differences in mean intra- or inter-rater EPT values at, above, or below the level of lesion (ASIA sensory level) for iSCI subjects. The intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.56-0.80 for intra-rater and 0.52-0.91 for inter-rater classes, depending on the level tested. There was a significant correlation (Pearson's r = 0.93) between EPTs for four different dermatomes of control subjects assessed using two different types of stimulator. EPT provides an objective and quantitative measure of threshold for cutaneous sensory function. The method has good inter- and intra-rater reliability, and can be assessed using different stimulators.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19203209     DOI: 10.1089/neu.2008.0787

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurotrauma        ISSN: 0897-7151            Impact factor:   5.269


  4 in total

1.  From the age of the pyramids to the superfast world--what has changed in the management of spinal injuries?

Authors:  Sreedhar Kolli; Clive Inman; J Chowdhury
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.659

2.  Time-Dependent Discrepancies between Assessments of Sensory Function after Incomplete Cervical Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Richard A Macklin; Jihye Bae; Melanie Orell; Kim D Anderson; Peter H Ellaway; Monica A Perez
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 5.269

3.  Discrepancies between clinical assessments of sensory function and electrical perceptual thresholds after incomplete chronic cervical spinal cord injury.

Authors:  R A Macklin; V J Brooke; F J Calabro; P H Ellaway; M A Perez
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 2.772

4.  Quantitative electrophysiological assessments as predictive markers of lower limb motor recovery after spinal cord injury: a pilot study with an adaptive trial design.

Authors:  Yin Nan Huang; El-Mehdi Meftah; Charlotte H Pion; Jean-Marc Mac-Thiong; Julien Cohen-Adad; Dorothy Barthélemy
Journal:  Spinal Cord Ser Cases       Date:  2022-02-24
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.