Literature DB >> 1920305

Are the results of controlled clinical trials and observational studies of second line therapy in rheumatoid arthritis valid and generalizable as measures of rheumatoid arthritis outcome: analysis of 122 studies.

D J Hawley1, F Wolfe.   

Abstract

We studied 122 controlled clinical trials and observational studies of second line therapy that involved 16,071 patients. The mean disease duration was 7.61 years at study entry. Controlled clinical trials were inherently short term, and 90.5% of patients were followed for 1 year or less (mean 8.8 months). The mean followup of observational studies was 31 months. Outcome assessments that included functional measurements were rare in either study type, as were considerations of socioeconomic factors. Except for methotrexate, which was used longer, half of the studies indicated discontinuation of therapy after 1.5 years. Good retention rates in studies of 3 to 12 months were not representative of longterm results, but controlled clinical trials and observational studies were similar as to retention during the first treatment year. Observational studies following controlled clinical trials can yield important information about RA treatment effectiveness not available from controlled clinical trials alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1920305

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rheumatol        ISSN: 0315-162X            Impact factor:   4.666


  11 in total

1.  Long-term effectiveness of antimalarial drugs in rheumatic diseases.

Authors:  J A Aviña-Zubieta; G Galindo-Rodriguez; S Newman; M E Suarez-Almazor; A S Russell
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 19.103

2.  Effectiveness of anti-tumor necrosis factor agents in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: observational study.

Authors:  Anna D'Souza; Brian L Meissner; Boxiong Tang; R Scott McKenzie; Catherine T Piech
Journal:  Am Health Drug Benefits       Date:  2010-07

Review 3.  An overview of economic evaluations for drugs used in rheumatoid arthritis : focus on tumour necrosis factor-alpha antagonists.

Authors:  Nick J Bansback; Dean A Regier; Roberta Ara; Alan Brennan; Kamran Shojania; John M Esdaile; Aslam H Anis; Carlo A Marra
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Survival and effectiveness of leflunomide compared with methotrexate and sulfasalazine in rheumatoid arthritis: a matched observational study.

Authors:  D Aletaha; T Stamm; T Kapral; G Eberl; J Grisar; K P Machold; J S Smolen
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 19.103

5.  A clinical and biochemical assessment of methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  T J Tait; P Le Gallez; C Astbury; H A Bird
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 2.980

6.  Infliximab treatment for rheumatoid arthritis, with dose titration based on the Disease Activity Score: dose adjustments are common but not always sufficient to assure sustained benefit.

Authors:  P Sidiropoulos; G Bertsias; H D Kritikos; H Kouroumali; K Voudouris; D T Boumpas
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 7.  Should contemporary rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials be more like standard patient care and vice versa?

Authors:  T Pincus; T Sokka
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 8.  A risk-benefit assessment of slow-acting antirheumatic drugs in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  A A Kalla; A F Tooke; E Bhettay; O L Meyers
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 5.606

9.  Continuation of long term treatment with hydroxychloroquine in systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  E F Morand; P I McCloud; G O Littlejohn
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 10.  Effective use of TNF antagonists.

Authors:  David Yocum
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2004-06-21       Impact factor: 5.156

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.