Rodrigo F Viecilli1, Jie Chen, Thomas R Katona, W Eugene Roberts. 1. Department of Orthodontics and Oral Facial Genetics, Indiana University School of Dentistry, Purdue School of Engineering and Technology, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA. rviecill@iupui.edu
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Tooth movement simulation is important for planning the optimal force system and appliance design to correct a specific malocclusion. Experimental verification of a 3-dimensional force system is described for a unique molar root movement strategy that can be adapted to many clinical scenarios. METHODS: The force system was measured for molar root movement springs that had adjustable alpha (anterior) and beta (posterior) moments. A 3-dimensional transducer assessed moments and forces in 3 planes during deactivation and simulated molar rotation. Two experimental situations were compared by using 10 springs in each group: spring reactivation was performed to compensate for changes in the force system caused by molar movement, or there was no reactivation. RESULTS: Without reactivation, the force system becomes unfavorable after approximately 5 degrees of molar movement (rotation). With reactivations, a favorable force system through 20 degrees of molar movement is maintained. CONCLUSIONS: Present root-movement appliances require periodic adjustment to achieve optimal tooth movement. Additional studies are needed to design orthodontic appliances for delivering optimal force systems for the entire range of tooth movement.
INTRODUCTION:Tooth movement simulation is important for planning the optimal force system and appliance design to correct a specific malocclusion. Experimental verification of a 3-dimensional force system is described for a unique molar root movement strategy that can be adapted to many clinical scenarios. METHODS: The force system was measured for molar root movement springs that had adjustable alpha (anterior) and beta (posterior) moments. A 3-dimensional transducer assessed moments and forces in 3 planes during deactivation and simulated molar rotation. Two experimental situations were compared by using 10 springs in each group: spring reactivation was performed to compensate for changes in the force system caused by molar movement, or there was no reactivation. RESULTS: Without reactivation, the force system becomes unfavorable after approximately 5 degrees of molar movement (rotation). With reactivations, a favorable force system through 20 degrees of molar movement is maintained. CONCLUSIONS: Present root-movement appliances require periodic adjustment to achieve optimal tooth movement. Additional studies are needed to design orthodontic appliances for delivering optimal force systems for the entire range of tooth movement.
Authors: Felipe Murakami-Malaquias-Silva; Ellen Perim Rosa; Paulo André Almeida; Tânia Oppido Schalch; Carlos Alberto Tenis; Renata Matalon Negreiros; Ricardo Fidos Horliana; Aguinaldo Silva Garcez; Marcella Ueda R Fernandes; Andre Tortamano; Lara Jansiski Motta; Sandra Kalil Bussadori; Anna Carolina Ratto Tempestini Horliana Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2020-03 Impact factor: 1.817