Literature DB >> 19201284

Histologic analysis of the effects of three different support materials within rat middle ear.

Salim Dogru1, Abdulah Haholu, Atila Gungor, Zafer Kucukodaci, Hakan Cincik, Taner Ozdemir, Huseyin Sen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate histologic changes in the mucosa of rat middle ear after implantation of three different support materials. STUDY
DESIGN: A prospective, controlled animal study. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Three types of absorbable materials were implanted into the middle ear cavity of rats: (1) Gelfoam (purified gelatin) (Pharmacia & Upjohn Company, New York, NY), (2) Sepragel (viscoelastic gel composed of cross-linked polymers of hyaluronan) (GENZYME Corp, Ridgefield, NJ), and (3) Nasopore (a biodegradable/fragmentable, synthetic polyurethane foam) (Polyganics, Groningen, The Netherlands). Rats were sacrificed after 3 and 20 days to ascertain early and late histologic changes. The bulla of each rat was excised and prepared for microscopic examination. The histologic changes were evaluated by observation of the middle ear cavity and mucosa in terms of polymorphonuclear leucocytes (PMNL), macrophages, giant cells, fibroblasts and other cells, fibrosis, and remnant materials.
RESULTS: The histologic appearance of gelfoam-treated middle ears was characterized by more severe acute inflammation in the short-term and prominent fibrosis in the long-term in comparison with sepragel- and nasopore-treated groups. Nasopore appeared to be prone to remnant formation and reorganization by means of fibroblastic activity.
CONCLUSION: Compared with gelfoam, both sepragel and nasopore caused less histologic alterations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19201284     DOI: 10.1016/j.otohns.2008.10.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


  7 in total

1.  A melting method for RNA extraction from the mucosal membrane of the mouse middle ear.

Authors:  Young Joon Seo; Sung Huhn Kim; In Seok Moon; Jae Young Choi
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.759

2.  Esterified Hyaluronic Acid Placed in the Middle Ear Does Not Improve Outcomes in Cholesteatoma Surgery.

Authors:  Colin Gerald Leonard; Florence Mok; Adrian L James
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 1.316

3.  OTO-201: nonclinical assessment of a sustained-release ciprofloxacin hydrogel for the treatment of otitis media.

Authors:  Xiaobo Wang; Rayne Fernandez; Natalia Tsivkovskaia; Anne Harrop-Jones; Huiying J Hou; Luis Dellamary; David F Dolan; Richard A Altschuler; Carl LeBel; Fabrice Piu
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.311

4.  Endoscopic cartilage myringoplasty with the removal of a small rim of the external auditory canal to repair marginal perforations.

Authors:  Zheng-Cai Lou
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-03-06

5.  Ototoxicity of boric acid powder in a rat animal model.

Authors:  Murat Salihoglu; Salim Dogru; Enver Cesmeci; Halil Caliskan; Onuralp Kurt; Zafer Kuçukodaci; Atila Gungor
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-04-22

6.  [Sugarcane biopolymer membrane: experimental evaluation in the middle ear].

Authors:  Débora Lopes Bunzen Mayer; Juliana Gusmão de Araújo; Mariana de Carvalho Leal; Silvio da Silva Caldas Neto; Rafael Figueiredo Ataíde; Roberto José Vieria de Mello
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb

7.  Middle ear packing materials: comparison between absorbable hemostatic gelatine sponge and sugarcane biopolymer sponge in rats.

Authors:  Débora Lopes Bunzen; Nathalia Lins; Mariana de Carvalho Leal; Mariana Montenegro de Melo Lira; Silvio da Silva Caldas Neto
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014 May-Jun
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.