Literature DB >> 19201100

Field effectiveness of pyrantel and failure of Parascaris equorum egg count reduction following ivermectin treatment in Italian horse farms.

Fabrizia Veronesi1, Iolanda Moretta, Annabella Moretti, Daniela Piergili Fioretti, Claudio Genchi.   

Abstract

A study was carried out to assess the field efficacy of ivermectin (IVM) and pyrantel pamoate (PYR) against Parascaris equorum. Seventy-three foals (3-18 months old) from 5 stud farms, not treated with anthelmintics in the previous 10 weeks and with individual faecal egg counts (FEC) >200, were included in the study. For each stud farm, 5-7 foals were included in the IVM-treatment group (IVM 0.2%, 200 mcg/kg body weight) or in the PYR-treatment group (PYR 38%, 13.2mg/kg body weight) and 3 were untreated as controls. For each foal, FECs were carried out before treatment (Day 0) and on Days 7 and 21. An individually based estimation of efficacy was assessed by a bootstrap simulation applied to different previously suggested formulae to evaluate the percent reduction of faecal egg counts (FECR). Two thousand bootstrap resamples were constructed from individual FECRs and the parasite population was considered susceptible for FECs >or=90 and 95% confidence interval (C.I.) >or=95%, suspected resistant for FECRs comprised between 80 and 90% and 95% C.I. <95% and resistant when FECR <or=80 and 95% C.I. <or=90%. IVM treatment was effective in foals from 2 farms, was equivocal at both study times in 1 farm and ineffective in 2 farms, while PYR was fully effective on all farms. This data shows that P. equorum-resistant populations are present also in Italy and the phenomenon is spreading in horses throughout Europe.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19201100     DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2009.01.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Parasitol        ISSN: 0304-4017            Impact factor:   2.738


  6 in total

1.  Further evaluation in field tests of the activity of three anthelmintics (fenbendazole, oxibendazole, and pyrantel pamoate) against the ascarid Parascaris equorum in horse foals on eight farms in Central Kentucky (2009-2010).

Authors:  Eugene T Lyons; Sharon C Tolliver; Tetiana A Kuzmina; Sandra S Collins
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2011-04-16       Impact factor: 2.289

2.  Restrictions of anthelmintic usage: perspectives and potential consequences.

Authors:  Martin K Nielsen
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 3.876

3.  Parascaris spp. eggs in horses of Italy: a large-scale epidemiological analysis of the egg excretion and conditioning factors.

Authors:  Antonio Scala; Claudia Tamponi; Giuliana Sanna; Giulio Predieri; Luisa Meloni; Stephane Knoll; Giampietro Sedda; Giorgia Dessì; Maria Grazia Cappai; Antonio Varcasia
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2021-05-08       Impact factor: 3.876

Review 4.  The equine ascarids: resuscitating historic model organisms for modern purposes.

Authors:  Jennifer L Cain; Martin K Nielsen
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2022-08-20       Impact factor: 2.383

5.  Moxidectin: a review of chemistry, pharmacokinetics and use in horses.

Authors:  Rami Cobb; Albert Boeckh
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 3.876

6.  Diagnosis and control of anthelmintic-resistant Parascaris equorum.

Authors:  Craig R Reinemeyer
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 3.876

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.