STUDY OBJECTIVE: Rapid access to emergency services is essential for emergency care-sensitive conditions such as acute myocardial infarction, stroke, sepsis, and major trauma. We seek to determine US population access to an emergency department (ED). METHODS: The National Emergency Department Inventories-USA was used to identify the location, annual visit volume, and teaching status of all EDs in the United States. EDs were categorized as any ED, by patient volume, and by teaching status. Driving distances, driving speeds, and out-of-hospital times were estimated with validated models and adjusted for population density. Access was determined by summing the population that could reach an ED within the specified intervals. RESULTS: Overall, 71% of the US population has access to an ED within 30 minutes, and 98% has access within 60 minutes. Access to teaching hospitals was more limited, with 16% having access within 30 minutes and 44% within 60 minutes. Rural states had lower access to all types of EDs. CONCLUSION: Although the majority of the US population has access to an ED, there are regional disparities in ED access, especially by rurality. Future efforts should measure the relationship between access to emergency services and outcomes for emergency care-sensitive conditions. The development of a regionalized emergency care delivery system should be explored.
STUDY OBJECTIVE: Rapid access to emergency services is essential for emergency care-sensitive conditions such as acute myocardial infarction, stroke, sepsis, and major trauma. We seek to determine US population access to an emergency department (ED). METHODS: The National Emergency Department Inventories-USA was used to identify the location, annual visit volume, and teaching status of all EDs in the United States. EDs were categorized as any ED, by patient volume, and by teaching status. Driving distances, driving speeds, and out-of-hospital times were estimated with validated models and adjusted for population density. Access was determined by summing the population that could reach an ED within the specified intervals. RESULTS: Overall, 71% of the US population has access to an ED within 30 minutes, and 98% has access within 60 minutes. Access to teaching hospitals was more limited, with 16% having access within 30 minutes and 44% within 60 minutes. Rural states had lower access to all types of EDs. CONCLUSION: Although the majority of the US population has access to an ED, there are regional disparities in ED access, especially by rurality. Future efforts should measure the relationship between access to emergency services and outcomes for emergency care-sensitive conditions. The development of a regionalized emergency care delivery system should be explored.
Authors: E Rivers; B Nguyen; S Havstad; J Ressler; A Muzzin; B Knoblich; E Peterson; M Tomlanovich Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2001-11-08 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Charles C Branas; Ellen J MacKenzie; Justin C Williams; C William Schwab; Harry M Teter; Marie C Flanigan; Alan J Blatt; Charles S ReVelle Journal: JAMA Date: 2005-06-01 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: B R Brodie; G W Stone; M C Morice; D A Cox; E Garcia; L A Mattos; J Boura; W W O'Neill; T D Stuckey; S Milks; A J Lansky; C L Grines Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2001-11-15 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Elliott M Antman; Daniel T Anbe; Paul Wayne Armstrong; Eric R Bates; Lee A Green; Mary Hand; Judith S Hochman; Harlan M Krumholz; Frederick G Kushner; Gervasio A Lamas; Charles J Mullany; Joseph P Ornato; David L Pearle; Michael A Sloan; Sidney C Smith Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2004-08-04 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: R Phillip Dellinger; Jean M Carlet; Henry Masur; Herwig Gerlach; Thierry Calandra; Jonathan Cohen; Juan Gea-Banacloche; Didier Keh; John C Marshall; Margaret M Parker; Graham Ramsay; Janice L Zimmerman; Jean-Louis Vincent; Mitchell M Levy Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: H P Adams; T G Brott; A J Furlan; C R Gomez; J Grotta; C M Helgason; T Kwiatkowski; P D Lyden; J R Marler; J Torner; W Feinberg; M Mayberg; W Thies Journal: Circulation Date: 1996-09-01 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Véronique L Roger; Alan S Go; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Robert J Adams; Jarett D Berry; Todd M Brown; Mercedes R Carnethon; Shifan Dai; Giovanni de Simone; Earl S Ford; Caroline S Fox; Heather J Fullerton; Cathleen Gillespie; Kurt J Greenlund; Susan M Hailpern; John A Heit; P Michael Ho; Virginia J Howard; Brett M Kissela; Steven J Kittner; Daniel T Lackland; Judith H Lichtman; Lynda D Lisabeth; Diane M Makuc; Gregory M Marcus; Ariane Marelli; David B Matchar; Mary M McDermott; James B Meigs; Claudia S Moy; Dariush Mozaffarian; Michael E Mussolino; Graham Nichol; Nina P Paynter; Wayne D Rosamond; Paul D Sorlie; Randall S Stafford; Tanya N Turan; Melanie B Turner; Nathan D Wong; Judith Wylie-Rosett Journal: Circulation Date: 2010-12-15 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Susan A Rudders; Aleena Banerji; Daniel P Katzman; Sunday Clark; Carlos A Camargo Journal: Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 6.347
Authors: David C Lee; Brendan G Carr; Tony E Smith; Van C Tran; Daniel Polsky; Charles C Branas Journal: Popul Health Manag Date: 2015-02-06 Impact factor: 2.459
Authors: Michael T Mullen; Charles C Branas; Scott E Kasner; Catherine Wolff; Justin C Williams; Karen C Albright; Brendan G Carr Journal: Neurology Date: 2015-03-04 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Catherine Wolff; Amelia K Boehme; Karen C Albright; Tzu-Ching Wu; Michael T Mullen; Charles C Branas; James C Grotta; Sean I Savitz; Brendan G Carr Journal: J Health Dispar Res Pract Date: 2016