Literature DB >> 19200995

Biomechanical properties of the mandibular condylar cartilage and their relevance to the TMJ disc.

M Singh1, M S Detamore.   

Abstract

Mandibular condylar cartilage plays a crucial role in temporomandibular joint (TMJ) function, which includes facilitating articulation with the TMJ disc, reducing loads on the underlying bone, and contributing to bone remodeling. To improve our understanding of the TMJ function in normal and pathological situations, accurate and validated three-dimensional (3-D) finite element models (FEMs) of the human TMJ may serve as valuable diagnostic tools as well as predictors of thresholds for tissue damage resulting from parafunctional activities and trauma. In this context, development of reliable biomechanical standards for condylar cartilage is crucial. Moreover, biomechanical characteristics of the native tissue are important design parameters for creating functional tissue-engineered replacements. Towards these goals, biomechanical characteristics of the condylar cartilage have been reviewed here, highlighting the structure-function correlations. Structurally, condylar cartilage, like the TMJ disc, exhibits zonal and topographical heterogeneity. Early structural investigations of the condylar cartilage have suggested that the tissue possesses a somewhat transversely isotropic orientation of collagen fibers in the fibrous zone. However, recent tensile and shear evaluations have reported a higher stiffness of the tissue in the anteroposterior direction than in the mediolateral direction, corresponding to an anisotropic fiber orientation comparable to the TMJ disc. In a few investigations, condylar cartilage under compression was found to be stiffer anteriorly than posteriorly. As with the TMJ disc, further compressive characterization is warranted. To draw inferences for human tissue using animal models, establishing stiffness-thickness correlations and regional evaluation of proteoglycan/glycosaminoglycan content may be essential. Efforts directed from the biomechanics community for the characterization of TMJ tissues will facilitate the development of reliable and accurate 3-D FEMs of the human TMJ.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19200995     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.12.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  26 in total

1.  Dynamic MRI of the TMJ under physical load.

Authors:  A J Hopfgartner; O Tymofiyeva; P Ehses; K Rottner; J Boldt; E-J Richter; P M Jakob
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  In vivo prediction of temporomandibular joint disc thickness and position changes for different jaw positions.

Authors:  Benedikt Sagl; Martina Schmid-Schwap; Eva Piehslinger; Claudia Kronnerwetter; Michael Kundi; Siegfried Trattnig; Ian Stavness
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 2.610

3.  iTRAQ-based quantitative proteomic analysis on differentially expressed proteins of rat mandibular condylar cartilage induced by reducing dietary loading.

Authors:  Liting Jiang; Yinyin Xie; Li Wei; Qi Zhou; Ning Li; Xinquan Jiang; Yiming Gao
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 4.592

4.  Collagen: quantification, biomechanics, and role of minor subtypes in cartilage.

Authors:  Benjamin J Bielajew; Jerry C Hu; Kyriacos A Athanasiou
Journal:  Nat Rev Mater       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 66.308

5.  Notch Regulates Fibrocartilage Stem Cell Fate and Is Upregulated in Inflammatory TMJ Arthritis.

Authors:  A Ruscitto; V Scarpa; M Morel; S Pylawka; C J Shawber; M C Embree
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 6.116

Review 6.  Tissue Engineering for the Temporomandibular Joint.

Authors:  Timothy M Acri; Kyungsup Shin; Dongrim Seol; Noah Z Laird; Ino Song; Sean M Geary; Jaidev L Chakka; James A Martin; Aliasger K Salem
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 9.933

Review 7.  Recent Tissue Engineering Advances for the Treatment of Temporomandibular Joint Disorders.

Authors:  Ashkan Aryaei; Natalia Vapniarsky; Jerry C Hu; Kyriacos A Athanasiou
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 5.096

8.  Viscoelastic shear properties of porcine temporomandibular joint disc.

Authors:  Y Wu; J Kuo; G J Wright; S E Cisewski; F Wei; M J Kern; H Yao
Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.826

9.  Mechanical stress promotes matrix synthesis of mandibular condylar cartilage via the RKIP-ERK pathway.

Authors:  Lian Sun; Jing Zhao; Hua Wang; Yongchu Pan; Lin Wang; Wei-Bing Zhang
Journal:  J Mol Histol       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 2.611

10.  Cell and matrix response of temporomandibular cartilage to mechanical loading.

Authors:  A Utreja; N A Dyment; S Yadav; M M Villa; Y Li; X Jiang; R Nanda; D W Rowe
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 6.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.