Literature DB >> 19200950

Pre-attentive auditory processing in ultra-high-risk for schizophrenia with magnetoencephalography.

Kyung Soon Shin1, June Sic Kim, Do-Hyung Kang, Yuri Koh, Jung-Seok Choi, Brian F O'Donnell, Chun Kee Chung, Jun Soo Kwon.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is uncertain whether the neurobiological abnormalities in schizophrenia emerge at the first episode of the disorder or are present during the prodromal phase. Recent neuroimaging studies indicate that some brain abnormalities are present in subjects at ultra-high-risk (UHR) for schizophrenia. Pre-attentive auditory deficits, which represent a core feature of schizophrenia, were investigated in individuals at UHR for schizophrenia.
METHODS: We assessed early auditory processing indexed by the magnetoencephalographic mismatch negativity magnetic counterpart (MMNm) component elicited during a passive oddball paradigm in UHR individuals. Sixteen individuals at UHR for schizophrenia on the basis of clinical criteria and 18 healthy control subjects matched for age, gender, and education participated. A duration-deviant oddball paradigm was used to obtain MMNm dipole moment, which was measured with cortical source modeling.
RESULTS: The UHR group showed a smaller right MMNm dipole moment than those of the control group. Group difference was observed in MMNm dipole latency, suggestive of slowed processing. The left MMNm dipole moment was negatively correlated with clinical symptoms measured by the Comprehensive Assessment of At-Risk Mental States positive symptom score.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that deficits in the early stage of auditory processing in individuals at UHR for schizophrenia exist before the onset of psychosis. The MMNm dipole moment might reflect the functional decline at the prodromal stage of schizophrenia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19200950     DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.12.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Psychiatry        ISSN: 0006-3223            Impact factor:   13.382


  32 in total

Review 1.  Central auditory disorders: toward a neuropsychology of auditory objects.

Authors:  Johanna C Goll; Sebastian J Crutch; Jason D Warren
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 5.710

2.  Cortical thickness reduction in individuals at ultra-high-risk for psychosis.

Authors:  Wi Hoon Jung; June Sic Kim; Joon Hwan Jang; Jung-Seok Choi; Myung Hun Jung; Ji-Young Park; Ji Yeon Han; Chi-Hoon Choi; Do-Hyung Kang; Chun Kee Chung; Jun Soo Kwon
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2009-12-21       Impact factor: 9.306

3.  Biomarkers and clinical staging in psychiatry.

Authors:  Patrick McGorry; Matcheri Keshavan; Sherilyn Goldstone; Paul Amminger; Kelly Allott; Michael Berk; Suzie Lavoie; Christos Pantelis; Alison Yung; Stephen Wood; Ian Hickie
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 49.548

4.  Auditory event-related potentials and α oscillations in the psychosis prodrome: neuronal generator patterns during a novelty oddball task.

Authors:  Jürgen Kayser; Craig E Tenke; Christopher J Kroppmann; Daniel M Alschuler; Shiva Fekri; Shelly Ben-David; Cheryl M Corcoran; Gerard E Bruder
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 2.997

5.  Early auditory gamma-band responses in patients at clinical high risk for schizophrenia.

Authors:  Veronica B Perez; Brian J Roach; Scott W Woods; Vinod H Srihari; Thomas H McGlashan; Judith M Ford; Daniel H Mathalon
Journal:  Suppl Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2013

6.  Mismatch negativity encoding of prediction errors predicts S-ketamine-induced cognitive impairments.

Authors:  André Schmidt; Rosilla Bachmann; Michael Kometer; Philipp A Csomor; Klaas E Stephan; Erich Seifritz; Franz X Vollenweider
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 7.853

7.  Automatic auditory processing deficits in schizophrenia and clinical high-risk patients: forecasting psychosis risk with mismatch negativity.

Authors:  Veronica B Perez; Scott W Woods; Brian J Roach; Judith M Ford; Thomas H McGlashan; Vinod H Srihari; Daniel H Mathalon
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 13.382

Review 8.  Research in people with psychosis risk syndrome: a review of the current evidence and future directions.

Authors:  Christoph U Correll; Marta Hauser; Andrea M Auther; Barbara A Cornblatt
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 8.982

Review 9.  Structural brain alterations in individuals at ultra-high risk for psychosis: a review of magnetic resonance imaging studies and future directions.

Authors:  Wi Hoon Jung; Joon Hwan Jang; Min Soo Byun; Suk Kyoon An; Jun Soo Kwon
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 2.153

10.  Altered resting-state connectivity in subjects at ultra-high risk for psychosis: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Geumsook Shim; Jungsu S Oh; Wi Hoon Jung; Joon Hwan Jang; Chi-Hoon Choi; Euitae Kim; Hye-Yoon Park; Jung-Seok Choi; Myung Hun Jung; Jun Soo Kwon
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2010-10-11       Impact factor: 3.759

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.