Literature DB >> 19200861

What can be learned from open direct comparative trials in multiple sclerosis?

Omar Khan1.   

Abstract

Randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trials are considered the "gold standard" for clinical research. A corollary of this is that data from observational open- label studies are viewed as having less validity, and as not providing accurate estimates of treatment effects. However, a number of systematic reviews have shown that well- designed observational studies are quantitatively or qualitatively similar to those measured in randomised controlled trials. Moreover, these observational studies performed under standard conditions of care provide useful reassurance that the findings of randomised controlled trials can be considered as broadly representative of the population at risk. Several such observational studies have been performed in multiple sclerosis in order to compare the effectiveness and tolerability of the different disease-modifying therapies available for the treatment of relapsing remitting disease. One of these was a prospective study conducted in 156 patients that compared the effects of high-dose interferon-beta and glatiramer acetate. This study indicated that the two treatments had similar efficacy on all measures evaluated. The effect sizes observed were very comparable to those observed in the pivotal trials of these two agents. This study predates by a decade a much larger randomised study which also failed to demonstrate a difference between the efficacy of high-dose interferon-beta and that of glatiramer acetate. Observational studies such as this can thus provide useful and reliable information on treatment effects and can be used for preliminary hypothesis testing at a fraction of the cost and constraints of pivotal trials. In the context of the increasing difficulty and expense of conducting randomised, placebo-controlled trials in multiple sclerosis, comparative studies using an open-label design or a rater-blinded design are likely to be increasingly employed in comparing existing and future therapies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19200861     DOI: 10.1016/S0022-510X(09)70008-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Sci        ISSN: 0022-510X            Impact factor:   3.181


  2 in total

1.  From injection therapies to natalizumab: views on the treatment of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Roberto Bomprezzi; Darin T Okuda; Yazan J Alderazi; Olaf Stüve; Elliot M Frohman
Journal:  Ther Adv Neurol Disord       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 6.570

Review 2.  Modelling the cost effectiveness of disease-modifying treatments for multiple sclerosis: issues to consider.

Authors:  Joel P Thompson; Amir Abdolahi; Katia Noyes
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.981

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.