BACKGROUND: Systemic exposure to amphetamine (AMPH) leads to a number of long-lasting neuroadaptations including changes in dendritic morphology in rat forebrain. It remains unknown whether these changes relate to associative drug conditioning or to nonassociative drug sensitization, two forms of plasticity produced by systemic exposure to AMPH. METHODS: We compared the behavioral, neuronal, and morphologic consequences of exposing rats to intraperitoneal (IP) AMPH to those of exposure to AMPH applied to the ventral tegmental area (VTA), infusions that sensitize AMPH-induced locomotion and nucleus accumbens (NAcc) DA overflow but do not produce drug conditioning. RESULTS: Both IP and VTA AMPH exposure sensitized locomotion and NAcc DA overflow, but only IP AMPH exposure produced conditioned locomotion. Importantly, whereas IP AMPH exposure increased spine density and dendritic length and branching in the NAcc, exposure to VTA AMPH produced the opposite effects. A similar differentiation of effects was observed in cortical areas. CONCLUSIONS: Together these findings suggest that the morphological changes seen following IP AMPH exposure reflect associative drug conditioning rather than nonassociative drug sensitization. The decreases observed in the NAcc of VTA AMPH exposed rats may reflect the inability of these infusions to support conditioning.
BACKGROUND: Systemic exposure to amphetamine (AMPH) leads to a number of long-lasting neuroadaptations including changes in dendritic morphology in rat forebrain. It remains unknown whether these changes relate to associative drug conditioning or to nonassociative drug sensitization, two forms of plasticity produced by systemic exposure to AMPH. METHODS: We compared the behavioral, neuronal, and morphologic consequences of exposing rats to intraperitoneal (IP) AMPH to those of exposure to AMPH applied to the ventral tegmental area (VTA), infusions that sensitize AMPH-induced locomotion and nucleus accumbens (NAcc) DA overflow but do not produce drug conditioning. RESULTS: Both IP and VTA AMPH exposure sensitized locomotion and NAcc DA overflow, but only IP AMPH exposure produced conditioned locomotion. Importantly, whereas IP AMPH exposure increased spine density and dendritic length and branching in the NAcc, exposure to VTA AMPH produced the opposite effects. A similar differentiation of effects was observed in cortical areas. CONCLUSIONS: Together these findings suggest that the morphological changes seen following IP AMPH exposure reflect associative drug conditioning rather than nonassociative drug sensitization. The decreases observed in the NAcc of VTA AMPH exposed rats may reflect the inability of these infusions to support conditioning.
Authors: David A Baker; Krista McFarland; Russell W Lake; Hui Shen; Xing-Chun Tang; Shigenobu Toda; Peter W Kalivas Journal: Nat Neurosci Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 24.884
Authors: Suprabha Pulipparacharuvil; William Renthal; Carly F Hale; Makoto Taniguchi; Guanghua Xiao; Arvind Kumar; Scott J Russo; Devanjan Sikder; Colleen M Dewey; Maya M Davis; Paul Greengard; Angus C Nairn; Eric J Nestler; Christopher W Cowan Journal: Neuron Date: 2008-08-28 Impact factor: 17.173
Authors: Bryan F Singer; Nancy Bubula; Dongdong Li; Magdalena M Przybycien-Szymanska; Vytautas P Bindokas; Paul Vezina Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2016-03-16 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Annabell C Segarra; Yvonne M Torres-Díaz; Richard D Silva; Anabel Puig-Ramos; Raissa Menéndez-Delmestre; José G Rivera-Bermúdez; Waldo Amadeo; José L Agosto-Rivera Journal: Horm Behav Date: 2013-12-17 Impact factor: 3.587
Authors: Kyle K Pitchers; Margaret E Balfour; Michael N Lehman; Neil M Richtand; Lei Yu; Lique M Coolen Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2009-12-16 Impact factor: 13.382