AIMS: The aim of this study was to examine a rapid method for detecting Escherichia coli and enterococci in recreational water. METHODS AND RESULTS: Water samples were assayed for E. coli and enterococci by traditional and immunomagnetic separation/adenosine triphosphate (IMS/ATP) methods. Three sample treatments were evaluated for the IMS/ATP method: double filtration, single filtration, and direct analysis. Pearson's correlation analysis showed strong, significant, linear relations between IMS/ATP and traditional methods for all sample treatments; strongest linear correlations were with the direct analysis (r = 0.62 and 0.77 for E. coli and enterococci, respectively). Additionally, simple linear regression was used to estimate bacteria concentrations as a function of IMS/ATP results. The correct classification of water-quality criteria was 67% for E. coli and 80% for enterococci. CONCLUSIONS: The IMS/ATP method is a viable alternative to traditional methods for faecal-indicator bacteria. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: The IMS/ATP method addresses critical public health needs for the rapid detection of faecal-indicator contamination and has potential for satisfying US legislative mandates requiring methods to detect bathing water contamination in 2 h or less. Moreover, IMS/ATP equipment is considerably less costly and more portable than that for molecular methods, making the method suitable for field applications.
AIMS: The aim of this study was to examine a rapid method for detecting Escherichia coli and enterococci in recreational water. METHODS AND RESULTS:Water samples were assayed for E. coli and enterococci by traditional and immunomagnetic separation/adenosine triphosphate (IMS/ATP) methods. Three sample treatments were evaluated for the IMS/ATP method: double filtration, single filtration, and direct analysis. Pearson's correlation analysis showed strong, significant, linear relations between IMS/ATP and traditional methods for all sample treatments; strongest linear correlations were with the direct analysis (r = 0.62 and 0.77 for E. coli and enterococci, respectively). Additionally, simple linear regression was used to estimate bacteria concentrations as a function of IMS/ATP results. The correct classification of water-quality criteria was 67% for E. coli and 80% for enterococci. CONCLUSIONS: The IMS/ATP method is a viable alternative to traditional methods for faecal-indicator bacteria. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: The IMS/ATP method addresses critical public health needs for the rapid detection of faecal-indicator contamination and has potential for satisfying US legislative mandates requiring methods to detect bathing water contamination in 2 h or less. Moreover, IMS/ATP equipment is considerably less costly and more portable than that for molecular methods, making the method suitable for field applications.
Authors: Rachel T Noble; A Denene Blackwood; John F Griffith; Charles D McGee; Stephen B Weisberg Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol Date: 2010-09-24 Impact factor: 4.792
Authors: John M Colford; Kenneth C Schiff; John F Griffith; Vince Yau; Benjamin F Arnold; Catherine C Wright; Joshua S Gruber; Timothy J Wade; Susan Burns; Jacqueline Hayes; Charles McGee; Mark Gold; Yiping Cao; Rachel T Noble; Richard Haugland; Stephen B Weisberg Journal: Water Res Date: 2012-02-02 Impact factor: 11.236
Authors: Claudia Kolm; Roland Martzy; Kurt Brunner; Robert L Mach; Rudolf Krska; Georg Heinze; Regina Sommer; Georg H Reischer; Andreas H Farnleitner Journal: Environ Sci Technol Date: 2017-06-09 Impact factor: 9.028
Authors: Yue O O Hu; Nelson Ndegwa; Johannes Alneberg; Sebastian Johansson; Jürg Brendan Logue; Mikael Huss; Max Käller; Joakim Lundeberg; Jens Fagerberg; Anders F Andersson Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2018-08-09 Impact factor: 4.379