Literature DB >> 19199028

Event-related potential study of novelty processing abnormalities in autism.

Estate Sokhadze1, Joshua Baruth, Allan Tasman, Lonnie Sears, Grace Mathai, Ayman El-Baz, Manuel F Casanova.   

Abstract

To better understand visual processing abnormalities in autism we studied the attention orienting related frontal event potentials (ERP) and the sustained attention related centro-parietal ERPs in a three stimulus oddball experiment. The three stimulus oddball paradigm was aimed to test the hypothesis that individuals with autism abnormally orient their attention to novel distracters as compared to controls. A dense-array 128 channel EGI electroencephalographic (EEG) system was used on 11 high-functioning children and young adults with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and 11 age-matched, typically developing control subjects. Patients with ASD showed slower reaction times but did not differ in response accuracy. At the anterior (frontal) topography the ASD group showed significantly higher amplitudes and longer latencies of early ERP components (e.g., P100, N100) to novel distracter stimuli in both hemispheres. The ASD group also showed prolonged latencies of late ERP components (e.g., P2a, N200, P3a) to novel distracter stimuli in both hemispheres. However, differences were more profound in the right hemisphere for both early and late ERP components. Our results indicate augmented and prolonged early frontal potentials and a delayed P3a component to novel stimuli, which suggest low selectivity in pre-processing and later-stage under-activation of integrative regions in the prefrontal cortices. Also, at the posterior (centro-parietal) topography the ASD group showed significantly prolonged N100 latencies and reduced amplitudes of the N2b component to target stimuli. In addition, the latency of the P3b component was prolonged to novel distracters in the ASD group. In general, the autistic group showed prolonged latencies to novel stimuli especially in the right hemisphere. These results suggest that individuals with autism over-process information needed for the successful differentiation of target and novel stimuli. We propose the potential application of ERP evaluations in a novelty task as outcome measurements in the biobehavioral treatment (e.g., EEG biofeedback, TMS) of autism.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19199028     DOI: 10.1007/s10484-009-9074-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback        ISSN: 1090-0586


  32 in total

1.  Impaired Error Monitoring and Correction Function in Autism.

Authors:  Estate Sokhadze; Joshua Baruth; Ayman El-Baz; Timothy Horrell; Guela Sokhadze; Thomas Carroll; Allan Tasman; Lonnie Sears; Manuel F Casanova
Journal:  J Neurother       Date:  2010-04-01

2.  Mice with reduced NMDA receptor expression: more consistent with autism than schizophrenia?

Authors:  M J Gandal; R L Anderson; E N Billingslea; G C Carlson; T P L Roberts; S J Siegel
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.449

3.  Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) Modulates Event-Related Potential (ERP) Indices of Attention in Autism.

Authors:  Manuel F Casanova; Joshua M Baruth; Ayman El-Baz; Allan Tasman; Lonnie Sears; Estate Sokhadze
Journal:  Transl Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 1.757

4.  Neuromodulation integrating rTMS and neurofeedback for the treatment of autism spectrum disorder: an exploratory study.

Authors:  Estate M Sokhadze; Ayman S El-Baz; Allan Tasman; Lonnie L Sears; Yao Wang; Eva V Lamina; Manuel F Casanova
Journal:  Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback       Date:  2014-12

5.  Children with autism show reduced somatosensory response: an MEG study.

Authors:  Elysa J Marco; Kasra Khatibi; Susanna S Hill; Bryna Siegel; Monica S Arroyo; Anne F Dowling; John M Neuhaus; Elliott H Sherr; Leighton N B Hinkley; Srikantan S Nagarajan
Journal:  Autism Res       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 5.216

6.  Tracking the sensory environment: an ERP study of probability and context updating in ASD.

Authors:  Marissa A Westerfield; Marla Zinni; Khang Vo; Jeanne Townsend
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2015-02

7.  Attenuated auditory event-related potentials and associations with atypical sensory response patterns in children with autism.

Authors:  Franc C L Donkers; Sarah E Schipul; Grace T Baranek; Katherine M Cleary; Michael T Willoughby; Anna M Evans; John C Bulluck; Jeanne E Lovmo; Aysenil Belger
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2015-02

8.  Habituation during encoding: A new approach to the evaluation of memory deficits in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Suzanne N Avery; Maureen McHugo; Kristan Armstrong; Jennifer U Blackford; Simon Vandekar; Neil D Woodward; Stephan Heckers
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 4.939

9.  EVENT-RELATED POTENTIAL STUDY OF ATTENTION REGULATION DURING ILLUSORY FIGURE CATEGORIZATION TASK IN ADHD, AUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDER, AND TYPICAL CHILDREN.

Authors:  Estate M Sokhadze; Joshua M Baruth; Lonnie Sears; Guela E Sokhadze; Ayman S El-Baz; Emily Williams; Robert Klapheke; Manuel F Casanova
Journal:  J Neurother       Date:  2012-03-02

10.  Low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) affects event-related potential measures of novelty processing in autism.

Authors:  Estate Sokhadze; Joshua Baruth; Allan Tasman; Mehreen Mansoor; Rajesh Ramaswamy; Lonnie Sears; Grace Mathai; Ayman El-Baz; Manuel F Casanova
Journal:  Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback       Date:  2010-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.