RATIONALE: Gamma-butyrolactone (GBL) and 1,4-butanediol (1,4-BD) are prodrugs for gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB). Like GHB, GBL and 1,4-BD are drugs of abuse, but their behavioral effects may differ from GHB under some conditions. OBJECTIVES: The first study compared the behavioral effects of GBL (32-240 mg/kg) and 1,4-BD (32-240 mg/kg) with each other and to effects previously reported for GHB (32-420 mg/kg). A second study determined GHB pharmacokinetics following intragastric administration of GHB, GBL, and 1,4-BD. METHODS: Operant responding for food, observed behavioral effects, and a fine-motor task occurred at multiple time intervals after administration of drug or vehicle. In a separate pharmacokinetics study, blood samples were collected across multiple time points after administration of GHB, GBL, and 1,4-BD. RESULTS: Like GHB, GBL, and 1,4-BD impaired performance on the fine-motor task, but the onset of motor impairment differed across drugs. GBL and 1,4-BD dose dependently decreased the number of food pellets earned, but at lower doses than previously observed for GHB. Similar to GHB, both GBL and 1,4-BD produced sedation, muscle relaxation, gastrointestinal symptoms, and tremors/jerks. Administration of GBL and 1,4-BD produced higher maximum concentrations of GHB with shorter times to maximum concentrations of GHB in plasma when compared to GHB administration. CONCLUSIONS: GBL and 1,4-BD produced behavioral effects similar to those previously reported with GHB and the time course of effects were related to blood levels of GHB. Given their higher potency and faster onset of effects, the abuse liability of GBL and 1,4-BD may be greater than GHB.
RATIONALE: Gamma-butyrolactone (GBL) and 1,4-butanediol (1,4-BD) are prodrugs for gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB). Like GHB, GBL and 1,4-BD are drugs of abuse, but their behavioral effects may differ from GHB under some conditions. OBJECTIVES: The first study compared the behavioral effects of GBL (32-240 mg/kg) and 1,4-BD (32-240 mg/kg) with each other and to effects previously reported for GHB (32-420 mg/kg). A second study determined GHB pharmacokinetics following intragastric administration of GHB, GBL, and 1,4-BD. METHODS: Operant responding for food, observed behavioral effects, and a fine-motor task occurred at multiple time intervals after administration of drug or vehicle. In a separate pharmacokinetics study, blood samples were collected across multiple time points after administration of GHB, GBL, and 1,4-BD. RESULTS: Like GHB, GBL, and 1,4-BD impaired performance on the fine-motor task, but the onset of motor impairment differed across drugs. GBL and 1,4-BD dose dependently decreased the number of food pellets earned, but at lower doses than previously observed for GHB. Similar to GHB, both GBL and 1,4-BD produced sedation, muscle relaxation, gastrointestinal symptoms, and tremors/jerks. Administration of GBL and 1,4-BD produced higher maximum concentrations of GHB with shorter times to maximum concentrations of GHB in plasma when compared to GHB administration. CONCLUSIONS:GBL and 1,4-BD produced behavioral effects similar to those previously reported with GHB and the time course of effects were related to blood levels of GHB. Given their higher potency and faster onset of effects, the abuse liability of GBL and 1,4-BD may be greater than GHB.
Authors: Lance R McMahon; Andrew Coop; Charles P France; Gail Winger; William L Woolverton Journal: Eur J Pharmacol Date: 2003-04-11 Impact factor: 4.432
Authors: Amy K Goodwin; Roland R Griffiths; P Rand Brown; Wolfgang Froestl; Cornelis Jakobs; K Michael Gibson; Elise M Weerts Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2006-09-20 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: P Palatini; L Tedeschi; G Frison; R Padrini; R Zordan; R Orlando; L Gallimberti; G L Gessa; S D Ferrara Journal: Eur J Clin Pharmacol Date: 1993 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: J F Navarro; C Pedraza; M Martín; J M Manzaneque; G Dávila; E Maldonado Journal: Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry Date: 1998-07 Impact factor: 5.067
Authors: Christopher M de Fiebre; Nancy Ellen C de Fiebre; Scott L Coleman; Michael J Forster Journal: Pharmacol Biochem Behav Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 3.533
Authors: Kyung-Jin Kim; Phillip L Pearl; Kimmo Jensen; O Carter Snead; Patrizia Malaspina; Cornelis Jakobs; K Michael Gibson Journal: Antioxid Redox Signal Date: 2011-04-10 Impact factor: 8.401
Authors: Amy K Goodwin; Melanie Mueller; Courtney D Shell; George A Ricaurte; Nancy A Ator Journal: J Pharmacol Exp Ther Date: 2013-03-20 Impact factor: 4.030