Literature DB >> 1919677

Cortical somatosensory evoked potentials. II. Effects of excision of somatosensory or motor cortex in humans and monkeys.

T Allison1, C C Wood, G McCarthy, D D Spencer.   

Abstract

1. To clarify the generators of human short-latency somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) thought to arise in sensorimotor cortex, we studied the effects on SEPs of surgical excision of somatosensory or motor cortex in humans and monkeys. 2. Normal median nerve SEPs (P20-N30, N20-P30, and P25-N35) were recorded from the cortical surface of a patient (G13) undergoing a cortical excision for relief of focal seizures. All SEPs were abolished both acutely and chronically after excision of the hand area of somatosensory cortex. Similarly, excision of the hand area of somatosensory cortex abolished corresponding SEPs (P10-N20, N10-P20, and P12-N25) in monkeys. Excision of the crown of monkey somatosensory cortex abolished P12-N25 while leaving P10-N20 and N10-P20 relatively unaffected. 3. After excision of the hand area of motor cortex, all SEPs were present when recorded from the cortical surface of a patient (W1) undergoing a cortical excision for relief of focal seizures. Similarly, all SEPs were present in monkeys after excision of the hand area of motor cortex. 4. Although all SEPs were present after excision of motor cortex in monkeys, variable changes were observed in SEPs after the excisions. However, these changes were not larger than the changes observed after excision of parietal cortex posterior to somatosensory cortex. We concluded that the changes were not specific to motor cortex excision. 5. These results support two major conclusions. 1) Median nerve SEPs recorded from sensorimotor cortex are produced by generators in two adjacent regions of somatosensory cortex: a tangentially oriented generator in area 3b, which produces P20-N30 (human) and P10-N20 (monkey) [recorded anterior to the central sulcus (CS)] and N20-P30 (human) and N10-P20 (monkey) posterior to the CS; and a radially oriented generator in area 1, which produces P25-N35 (human) and P12-N25 (monkey) recorded from the postcentral gyrus near the CS. 2) Motor cortex makes little or no contribution to these potentials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1919677     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1991.66.1.64

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  20 in total

1.  Sources on the anterior and posterior banks of the central sulcus identified from magnetic somatosensory evoked responses using multistart spatio-temporal localization.

Authors:  M X Huang; C Aine; L Davis; J Butman; R Christner; M Weisend; J Stephen; J Meyer; J Silveri; M Herman; R R Lee
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  The impact of light fingertip touch on haptic cortical processing during a standing balance task.

Authors:  David A E Bolton; William E McIlroy; W Richard Staines; W Richard Staines
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Transcranial focused ultrasound modulates the activity of primary somatosensory cortex in humans.

Authors:  Wynn Legon; Tomokazu F Sato; Alexander Opitz; Jerel Mueller; Aaron Barbour; Amanda Williams; William J Tyler
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-12       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Dipole source analyses of early median nerve SEP components obtained from subdural grid recordings.

Authors:  Ulf Baumgärtner; Hagen Vogel; Shinji Ohara; Rolf-Detlef Treede; Fred A Lenz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Difference in somatosensory evoked fields elicited by mechanical and electrical stimulations: Elucidation of the human homunculus by a noninvasive method.

Authors:  Ken Inoue; Takushi Shirai; Kazuyoshi Nakanishi; Akira Hashizume; Toshihide Harada; Yasuyo Mimori; Masayasu Matsumoto
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  BA3b and BA1 activate in a serial fashion after median nerve stimulation: direct evidence from combining source analysis of evoked fields and cytoarchitectonic probabilistic maps.

Authors:  Christos Papadelis; Simon B Eickhoff; Karl Zilles; Andreas A Ioannides
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Brain network modulation in transradial amputee with finger perception restored through biomimetic intraneural stimulation.

Authors:  Fabrizio Vecchio; Francesca Miraglia; Francesca Alù; Giacomo Valle; Alberto Mazzoni; Calogero Oddo; Silvestro Micera; Paolo Maria Rossini
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 3.307

8.  Identification of target areas for deep brain stimulation in human basal ganglia substructures based on median nerve sensory evoked potential criteria.

Authors:  F Klostermann; J Vesper; G Curio
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 10.154

9.  Spatiotemporal mapping the neural correlates of acupuncture with MEG.

Authors:  Rupali P Dhond; Thomas Witzel; Matti Hämäläinen; Norman Kettner; Vitaly Napadow
Journal:  J Altern Complement Med       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.579

10.  Differences in cortical response to acupressure and electroacupuncture stimuli.

Authors:  Thomas Witzel; Vitaly Napadow; Norman W Kettner; Mark G Vangel; Matti S Hämäläinen; Rupali P Dhond
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 3.288

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.