AIMS: Studies suggest that patients with advanced heart failure (HF) have unmet palliative care (PC) needs. However, many of these studies have been retrospective or based on patients receiving poorly coordinated ad hoc care. We aimed to demonstrate whether the PC needs of patients with advanced HF receiving specialist multidisciplinary coordinated care are similar to cancer patients deemed to have specialist PC needs; thereby justifying the extension of specialist PC services to HF patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: This was a cross-sectional comparative cohort study of 50 HF patients and 50 cancer patients, using quantitative and qualitative methods. Both patient cohorts were statistically indistinguishable in terms of symptom burden, emotional wellbeing, and quality-of-life scores. HF patients had good access to community and social support. HF patients particularly valued the close supervision, medication monitoring, ease of access to service, telephone support, and key worker provided at the HF unit. A small subset of patients had unmet PC needs. A palliative transition point is described. CONCLUSION: HF patients should not be excluded from specialist PC services. However, the majority of their needs can be met at a HF unit. Recognition of the palliative transition point may be key to ensuring that end-of-life issues are addressed. The palliative transition point needs further evaluation.
AIMS: Studies suggest that patients with advanced heart failure (HF) have unmet palliative care (PC) needs. However, many of these studies have been retrospective or based on patients receiving poorly coordinated ad hoc care. We aimed to demonstrate whether the PC needs of patients with advanced HF receiving specialist multidisciplinary coordinated care are similar to cancerpatients deemed to have specialist PC needs; thereby justifying the extension of specialist PC services to HF patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: This was a cross-sectional comparative cohort study of 50 HF patients and 50 cancerpatients, using quantitative and qualitative methods. Both patient cohorts were statistically indistinguishable in terms of symptom burden, emotional wellbeing, and quality-of-life scores. HF patients had good access to community and social support. HF patients particularly valued the close supervision, medication monitoring, ease of access to service, telephone support, and key worker provided at the HF unit. A small subset of patients had unmet PC needs. A palliative transition point is described. CONCLUSION: HF patients should not be excluded from specialist PC services. However, the majority of their needs can be met at a HF unit. Recognition of the palliative transition point may be key to ensuring that end-of-life issues are addressed. The palliative transition point needs further evaluation.
Authors: John G Cagle; Morgan Bunting; Anne Kelemen; Joonyup Lee; Dorothy Terry; Ryan Harris Journal: Heart Fail Rev Date: 2017-09 Impact factor: 4.214
Authors: Laura P Gelfman; Dio Kavalieratos; Winifred G Teuteberg; Anuradha Lala; Nathan E Goldstein Journal: Heart Fail Rev Date: 2017-09 Impact factor: 4.214
Authors: Yuchieh Kathryn Chang; Holland Kaplan; Yimin Geng; Li Mo; Jennifer Philip; Anna Collins; Larry A Allen; John A McClung; Martin A Denvir; David Hui Journal: Circ Heart Fail Date: 2020-09-09 Impact factor: 8.790
Authors: Keith M Swetz; Monica R Freeman; Omar F AbouEzzeddine; Kari A Carter; Barry A Boilson; Abigale L Ottenberg; Soon J Park; Paul S Mueller Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Date: 2011-06 Impact factor: 7.616
Authors: Dio Kavalieratos; Arif H Kamal; Amy P Abernethy; Andrea K Biddle; Timothy S Carey; Sandesh Dev; Bryce B Reeve; Morris Weinberger Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2014-03-03 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Marie Bakitas; Meredith Macmartin; Kenneth Trzepkowski; Alina Robert; Lisa Jackson; Jeremiah R Brown; James N Dionne-Odom; Alan Kono Journal: J Card Fail Date: 2013-03 Impact factor: 5.712
Authors: Lorraine S Evangelista; Marjan Motie; Dawn Lombardo; Jennifer Ballard-Hernandez; Shaista Malik; Solomon Liao Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2012-09-18 Impact factor: 2.947