Literature DB >> 19196742

Clinical and microbiological profiles of community-acquired and nosocomial intra-abdominal infections: results of the French prospective, observational EBIIA study.

Philippe Montravers1, Alain Lepape, Luc Dubreuil, Rémy Gauzit, Yves Pean, Daniel Benchimol, Hervé Dupont.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The EBIIA (Etude épidémiologique Bactério-clinique des Infections Intra-Abdominales) study was designed to describe the clinical, microbiological and resistance profiles of community-acquired and nosocomial intra-abdominal infections (IAIs). PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January to July 2005, patients undergoing surgery/interventional drainage for IAIs with a positive microbiological culture were included by 25 French centres. The primary endpoint was the epidemiology of the microorganisms and their resistance to antibiotics. Multivariate analysis was carried out using stepwise logistic regression to assess the factors predictive of death during hospitalization.
RESULTS: Three hundred and thirty-one patients (234 community-acquired and 97 nosocomial) were included. The distribution of the microorganisms differed according to the type of infection. Carbapenems and amikacin were the most active agents in vitro against Enterobacteriaceae in both community-acquired and nosocomial infections. Against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, amikacin, imipenem, ceftazidime and ciprofloxacin were the most active agents in community-acquired infections, while imipenem, cefepime and amikacin were the most active in nosocomial cases. Against the Gram-positive bacteria, vancomycin and teicoplanin were the most active in both infections. Against anaerobic bacteria, the most active agents were metronidazole and carbapenems in both groups. Empirical antibiotic therapy adequately targeted the pathogens for 63% of community-acquired and 64% of nosocomial peritonitis. The presence of one or more co-morbidities [odds ratio (OR) = 3.17; P = 0.007], one or more severity criteria (OR = 4.90; P < 0.001) and generalized peritonitis (OR = 3.17; P = 0.006) were predictive of death.
CONCLUSIONS: The principal results of EBIIA are a higher diversity of microorganisms isolated in nosocomial infections and decreased susceptibility among these strains. Despite this, the adequacy of treatment is comparable in the two groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19196742     DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkp005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother        ISSN: 0305-7453            Impact factor:   5.790


  50 in total

1.  Susceptibility of gram-negative pathogens isolated from patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections in the United States, 2007-2008: results of the Study for Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance Trends (SMART).

Authors:  Daryl J Hoban; Samuel K Bouchillon; Stephen P Hawser; Robert E Badal; Vincent J Labombardi; Joseph DiPersio
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 2.  Antimicrobial Lessons From a Large Observational Cohort on Intra-abdominal Infections in Intensive Care Units.

Authors:  Dirk Vogelaers; Stijn Blot; Andries Van den Berge; Philippe Montravers
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Bacteriology and antimicrobial susceptibility of ESBLs producers from pus in patients with abdominal trauma associated intra-abdominal infections.

Authors:  S Fan; J Wang; Y Li; J Li
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 3.693

4.  Impact of Surgical Infection Society/Infectious Disease Society of America-recommended antibiotics on postoperative intra-abdominal abscess with image-guided percutaneous abscess drainage following gastrointestinal surgery.

Authors:  Yoshiki Okita; Minako Kobayashi; Toshimitsu Araki; Hiroyuki Fujikawa; Yuhki Koike; Koike Yuki; Kohei Otake; Otake Kohei; Inoue Mikihiro; Inoue Mikihiro; Yuji Toiyama; Toiyama Yuji; Masaki Ohi; Msaki Ohi; Koji Tanaka; Yasuhiro Inoue; Keiichi Uchida; Yasuhiko Mohri; Koichiro Yamakado; Masato Kusunoki
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-10-18       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 5.  Secondary peritonitis: principles of diagnosis and intervention.

Authors:  James T Ross; Michael A Matthay; Hobart W Harris
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2018-06-18

Review 6.  Post-operative abdominal infections: epidemiology, operational definitions, and outcomes.

Authors:  Matteo Bassetti; Christian Eckmann; Daniele Roberto Giacobbe; Massimo Sartelli; Philippe Montravers
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Therapeutic management of peritonitis: a comprehensive guide for intensivists.

Authors:  P Montravers; S Blot; G Dimopoulos; C Eckmann; P Eggimann; X Guirao; J A Paiva; G Sganga; J De Waele
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  A focus on intra-abdominal infections.

Authors:  Massimo Sartelli
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Risk factors for multidrug resistant bacteria and optimization of empirical antibiotic therapy in postoperative peritonitis.

Authors:  Pascal Augustin; Nathalie Kermarrec; Claudette Muller-Serieys; Sigismond Lasocki; Denis Chosidow; Jean-Pierre Marmuse; Nadia Valin; Jean-Marie Desmonts; Philippe Montravers
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2010-02-15       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  Characteristics and Outcomes of Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections Involving Pseudomonas aeruginosa from a Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase 3 Ceftolozane-Tazobactam Study.

Authors:  Benjamin Miller; Myra W Popejoy; Ellie Hershberger; Judith N Steenbergen; John Alverdy
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.