Literature DB >> 19196350

Cowpea bruchid midgut transcriptome response to a soybean cystatin--costs and benefits of counter-defence.

Y H Chi1, R A Salzman, S Balfe, J-E Ahn, W Sun, J Moon, D-J Yun, S Y Lee, T J V Higgins, B Pittendrigh, L L Murdock, K Zhu-Salzman.   

Abstract

The insect digestive system is the first line of defence protecting cells and tissues of the body from a broad spectrum of toxins and antinutritional factors in its food. To gain insight into the nature and breadth of genes involved in adaptation to dietary challenge, a collection of 20 352 cDNAs was prepared from the midgut tissue of cowpea bruchid larvae (Callosobruchus maculatus) fed on regular diet and diets containing antinutritional compounds. Transcript responses of the larvae to dietary soybean cystatin (scN) were analysed using cDNA microarrays, followed by quantitative real-time PCR (RT-PCR) confirmation with selected genes. The midgut transcript profile of insects fed a sustained sublethal scN dose over the larval life was compared with that of insects treated with an acute high dose of scN for 24 h. A total of 1756 scN-responsive cDNAs was sequenced; these clustered into 967 contigs, of which 653 were singletons. Many contigs (451) did not show homology with known genes, or had homology only with genes of unknown function in a Blast search. The identified differentially regulated sequences encoded proteins presumptively involved in metabolism, structure, development, signalling, defence and stress response. Expression patterns of some scN-responsive genes were consistent in each larval stage, whereas others exhibited developmental stage-specificity. Acute (24 h), high level exposure to dietary scN caused altered expression of a set of genes partially overlapping with the transcript profile seen under chronic lower level exposure. Protein and carbohydrate hydrolases were generally up-regulated by scN whereas structural, defence and stress-related genes were largely down-regulated. These results show that insects actively mobilize genomic resources in the alimentary tract to mitigate the impact of a digestive protease inhibitor. The enhanced or restored digestibility that may result is possibly crucial for insect survival, yet may be bought at the cost of weakened response to other stresses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19196350     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2583.2008.00854.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Insect Mol Biol        ISSN: 0962-1075            Impact factor:   3.585


  10 in total

Review 1.  We can't all be supermodels: the value of comparative transcriptomics to the study of non-model insects.

Authors:  Sara J Oppenheim; Richard H Baker; Sabrina Simon; Rob DeSalle
Journal:  Insect Mol Biol       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 3.585

2.  Plant Defense Inhibitors Affect the Structures of Midgut Cells in Drosophila melanogaster and Callosobruchus maculatus.

Authors:  Hongmei Li-Byarlay; Barry R Pittendrigh; Larry L Murdock
Journal:  Int J Insect Sci       Date:  2016-08-29

3.  Deep, Staged Transcriptomic Resources for the Novel Coleopteran Models Atrachya menetriesi and Callosobruchus maculatus.

Authors:  Matthew A Benton; Nathan J Kenny; Kai H Conrads; Siegfried Roth; Jeremy A Lynch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Transcriptional Analysis of The Adaptive Digestive System of The Migratory Locust in Response to Plant Defensive Protease Inhibitors.

Authors:  Jornt Spit; Michiel Holtof; Liesbet Badisco; Lucia Vergauwen; Elise Vogel; Dries Knapen; Jozef Vanden Broeck
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Pectin Digestion in Herbivorous Beetles: Impact of Pseudoenzymes Exceeds That of Their Active Counterparts.

Authors:  Roy Kirsch; Grit Kunert; Heiko Vogel; Yannick Pauchet
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 4.566

6.  Plants use identical inhibitors to protect their cell wall pectin against microbes and insects.

Authors:  Roy Kirsch; Esma Vurmaz; Carolin Schaefer; Franziska Eberl; Theresa Sporer; Wiebke Haeger; Yannick Pauchet
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Antagonistic regulation, yet synergistic defense: effect of bergapten and protease inhibitor on development of cowpea bruchid Callosobruchus maculatus.

Authors:  Fengguang Guo; Jiaxin Lei; Yucheng Sun; Yong Hun Chi; Feng Ge; Bhimanagouda S Patil; Hisashi Koiwa; Rensen Zeng; Keyan Zhu-Salzman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Abnormally high digestive enzyme activity and gene expression explain the contemporary evolution of a Diabrotica biotype able to feed on soybeans.

Authors:  Matías J Curzi; Jorge A Zavala; Joseph L Spencer; Manfredo J Seufferheld
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Evolution and functional characterization of CAZymes belonging to subfamily 10 of glycoside hydrolase family 5 (GH5_10) in two species of phytophagous beetles.

Authors:  André Busch; Grit Kunert; David G Heckel; Yannick Pauchet
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Mechanism of Resistance in Mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek var. radiata] to bruchids, Callosobruchus spp. (Coleoptera: Bruchidae).

Authors:  Abdul R War; Surya Murugesan; Venkata N Boddepalli; Ramasamy Srinivasan; Ramakrishnan M Nair
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 5.753

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.