Literature DB >> 19195732

Influence of daily setup measurements and corrections on the estimated delivered dose during IMRT treatment of prostate cancer patients.

Paul M A van Haaren1, Arjan Bel, Pieter Hofman, Marco van Vulpen, Alexis N T J Kotte, Uulke A van der Heide.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of marker-based position verification, using daily imaging and an off-line correction protocol, by calculating the delivered dose to prostate, rectum and bladder.
METHODS: Prostate cancer patients (n=217) were treated with IMRT, receiving 35 daily fractions. Plans with five beams were optimized taking target coverage (CTV, boost) and organs-at-risk (rectum and bladder) into account. PTV margins were 8mm. Prostate position was verified daily using implanted fiducial gold markers by imaging the first segment of all the five beams on an EPID. Setup deviations were corrected off-line using an adapted shrinking-action-level protocol. The estimated delivered dose, including daily organ movements, was calculated using a version of PLATO's dose engine, enabling batch processing of large numbers of patients. The dose was calculated +/- inclusion of setup corrections, and was evaluated relative to the original static plan. The marker-based measurements were considered representative for all organs.
RESULTS: Daily organ movements would result in an underdosage of 2-3Gy to CTV and boost volume relative to the original plan, which was prevented by daily setup corrections. The dose to rectum and bladder was on average unchanged, but a large spread was introduced by organ movements, which was reduced by including setup corrections.
CONCLUSIONS: Without position verification and setup corrections, margins of 8mm would be insufficient to account for position uncertainties during IMRT of prostate cancer. With the daily off-line correction protocol, the remaining variations are accommodated adequately.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19195732     DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2008.12.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  17 in total

1.  Motion-compensated estimation of delivered dose during external beam radiation therapy: implementation in Philips' Pinnacle(3) treatment planning system.

Authors:  Shyam Bharat; Parag Parikh; Camille Noel; Michael Meltsner; Karl Bzdusek; Michael Kaus
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  A simulation technique for computation of the dosimetric effects of setup, organ motion and delineation uncertainties in radiotherapy.

Authors:  Bongile Mzenda; Mir Hosseini-Ashrafi; Antony Palmer; Honghai Liu; David J Brown
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2010-04-23       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  The impact of androgen deprivation therapy on setup errors during external beam radiation therapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Cem Onal; Yemliha Dolek; Yurday Ozdemir
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 4.  Radiotherapy for high-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jahan J Mohiuddin; Brock R Baker; Ronald C Chen
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 14.432

5.  Assessment and quantification of patient set-up errors in nasopharyngeal cancer patients and their biological and dosimetric impact in terms of generalized equivalent uniform dose (gEUD), tumour control probability (TCP) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP).

Authors:  A Boughalia; S Marcie; M Fellah; S Chami; F Mekki
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Reducing radiation-associated toxicity using online image guidance (IGRT) in prostate cancer patients undergoing dose-escalated radiation therapy.

Authors:  Martina Becker-Schiebe; Ali Abaci; Tahera Ahmad; Wolfgang Hoffmann
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2016-02-20

7.  Statistical simulations to estimate motion-inclusive dose-volume histograms for prediction of rectal morbidity following radiotherapy.

Authors:  Maria Thor; Aditya Apte; Joseph O Deasy; Ludvig Paul Muren
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2012-12-04       Impact factor: 4.089

8.  Evaluation of combining bony anatomy and soft tissue position correction strategies for IMRT prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  Marta Adamczyk; Tomasz Piotrowski; Ewa Adamiak
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2012-02-09

9.  Reducing errors in prostate tracking with an improved fiducial implantation protocol for CyberKnife based stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT).

Authors:  Oliver E Holmes; Julie Gratton; Janos Szanto; Eric Vandervoort; Janice Doody; Elizabeth Henderson; Scott C Morgan; Joseph O'Sullivan; Shawn Malone
Journal:  J Radiosurg SBRT       Date:  2018

10.  The effect of on-line position correction on the dose distribution in focal radiotherapy for bladder cancer.

Authors:  Dominique C van Rooijen; Jeroen B van de Kamer; René Pool; Maarten C C M Hulshof; Caro C E Koning; Arjan Bel
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 3.481

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.