Literature DB >> 19194855

Employee absenteeism measures reflecting current work practices may be instrumental in a re-evaluation of the relationship between psychological distress/mental health and absenteeism.

Michael F Hilton1, Judith Sheridan, Catherine M Cleary, Harvey A Whiteford.   

Abstract

Absenteeism rates are the cornerstone metrics guiding corporate policy for health care investment in employees. However, traditional absenteeism measures do not reflect the contemporary workplace milieu. It is accepted practice that employees work evenings or weekends to makeup time. Using a hours-based absenteeism measure, that accounts for time made-up as well as time lost, this paper evaluates the impact of psychological distress on employee absenteeism.Psychological distress and absenteeism data were collected from 54,264 full-time employees. Consistent with traditional approaches, employees indicated how many days they were absent. Hours based absenteeism was formulated from the ratio of how many hours the employees worked and how many hours were they expected to work in the past seven-days.Concordant with previous concinnous evidence, traditional absenteeism computation indicated that elevated psychological distress is associated with increasing absenteeism. Using the hours-based method psychological distress did not significantly influence absenteeism.Traditional calculations of absenteeism do not reflect the current work practices of the majority of employees. Employees with psychological distress may take time off work but it appears that they make up for lost time possibly to stay up to speed with task driven occupations and avoid performance review.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19194855      PMCID: PMC6878435          DOI: 10.1002/mpr.275

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res        ISSN: 1049-8931            Impact factor:   4.035


  30 in total

1.  Screening for serious mental illness in the general population.

Authors:  Ronald C Kessler; Peggy R Barker; Lisa J Colpe; Joan F Epstein; Joseph C Gfroerer; Eva Hiripi; Mary J Howes; Sharon-Lise T Normand; Ronald W Manderscheid; Ellen E Walters; Alan M Zaslavsky
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2003-02

2.  Effects of efforts to increase response rates on a workplace chronic condition screening survey.

Authors:  Philip S Wang; Arne L Beck; David K McKenas; Laurie M Meneades; Nicolaas P Pronk; John S Saylor; Gregory E Simon; Ellen E Walters; Ronald C Kessler
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  The performance of the K6 and K10 screening scales for psychological distress in the Australian National Survey of Mental Health and Well-Being.

Authors:  T A Furukawa; R C Kessler; T Slade; G Andrews
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 7.723

4.  Evaluation of 2 measures of psychological distress as screeners for depression in the general population.

Authors:  John Cairney; Scott Veldhuizen; Terrance J Wade; Paul Kurdyak; David L Streiner
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.356

5.  Disability in Te Rau Hinengaro: the New Zealand Mental Health Survey.

Authors:  Kate M Scott; Magnus A McGee; J Elisabeth Wells; Mark A Oakley Browne
Journal:  Aust N Z J Psychiatry       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.744

6.  Lost productivity among full-time workers with mental disorders.

Authors:  Debbie Lim; Kristy Sanderson; Gavin Andrews
Journal:  J Ment Health Policy Econ       Date:  2000-09-01

7.  Effects of consent form information on self-disclosure.

Authors:  Sandra T Sigmon; Kelly J Rohan; Diana Dorhofer; Lisa A Hotovy; Peter C Trask; Nina Boulard
Journal:  Ethics Behav       Date:  1997

8.  Telephone screening, outreach, and care management for depressed workers and impact on clinical and work productivity outcomes: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Philip S Wang; Gregory E Simon; Jerry Avorn; Francisca Azocar; Evette J Ludman; Joyce McCulloch; Maria Z Petukhova; Ronald C Kessler
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-09-26       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Emotional disability days: prevalence and predictors.

Authors:  A C Kouzis; W W Eaton
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Work characteristics predict psychiatric disorder: prospective results from the Whitehall II Study.

Authors:  S A Stansfeld; R Fuhrer; M J Shipley; M G Marmot
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.402

View more
  5 in total

1.  Sick leave and its determinants in professional soldiers of the Slovenian Armed Forces.

Authors:  Polona Selič; Davorina Petek; Maša Serec; Maja Rus Makovec
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.351

2.  Self-reported work ability and work performance in workers with chronic nonspecific musculoskeletal pain.

Authors:  Haitze J de Vries; Michiel F Reneman; Johan W Groothoff; Jan H B Geertzen; Sandra Brouwer
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2013-03

3.  Health-related productivity losses increase when the health condition is co-morbid with psychological distress: findings from a large cross-sectional sample of working Australians.

Authors:  Libby Holden; Paul A Scuffham; Michael F Hilton; Robert S Ware; Nerina Vecchio; Harvey A Whiteford
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  Screening results correlating to personality disorder traits in a new employee population of People's Republic of China.

Authors:  Yan Tan; Yan Liu; Lei Wu
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 2.570

5.  Psychological distress, related work attendance, and productivity loss in small-to-medium enterprise owner/managers.

Authors:  Fiona Cocker; Angela Martin; Jenn Scott; Alison Venn; Kristy Sanderson
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.