| Literature DB >> 19194551 |
Yong-Kook Lee1, Joon-Yeop Lee, Jun-Seup Kim, Ki-Bum Won, Hyeok-Joo Kang, Tae-Jung Jang, Woo-Taek Tak, Jeong-Ho Lee.
Abstract
It has been demonstrated that inhibitors of advanced glycation end products (AGE), such as aminoguanidine, can suppress peritoneal AGE in rats on peritoneal dialysis (PD). However, it is unknown whether late administration of a putative cross-link breaker, alagebrium, could reverse peritoneal AGE. We therefore compared alagebrium with aminoguanidine in their ability to reverse peritoneal AGE in rats on PD. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into 3 groups: group I dialyzed with 4.25% glucose solution for all exchanges; group II dialyzed with 4.25% glucose solution containing aminoguanidine, and group III dialyzed with 4.25% glucose solution containing alagebrium for last 8 weeks of 12-week dialysis period. Dialysis exchanges were performed 2 times a day for 12 weeks. Immunohistochemistry was performed using a monoclonal anti-AGE antibody. One-hour PET was performed for comparison of transport characteristics. The immunolabelling of AGE in peritoneal membrane was markedly decreased in the alagebrium group. Consistent with this, the alagebrium group exhibited significantly higher D/Do glucose and lower D/P urea, suggesting low peritoneal membrane transport. But there were no significant differences between the control and the aminoguanidine group. These results suggest that the alagebrium may be the optimal therapeutic approach, compared with treatment with inhibitors of AGE formation, in rats on PD.Entities:
Keywords: Advanced Glycation End Products; Alagebrium; Aminoguanidine; Peritoneal Dialysis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19194551 PMCID: PMC2633188 DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2009.24.S1.S189
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Korean Med Sci ISSN: 1011-8934 Impact factor: 2.153
Fig. 1Immunostaining for advanced glycation end products in the peritoneal mesothelial cell. The mesothelial cells of group I (A) and group II (B) show moderate to strong expression. However, the mesothelial cells of group III (C) show weak expression.
Fig. 2Immunostaining for advanced glycation end products in the peritoneal vascular wall. The vessels of group I (A) and group II (B) show moderate to strong expression. However, the vessels of group III (C) show weak expression.
Fig. 3Semiquantitative scoring of advanced glycation end products immunohistology.
*p<0.05 (control vs. alagebrium); †p<0.05 (aminoguanidine vs. alagebrium).
Peritoneal transport of glucose, urea nitrogen, and creatinine
Data are presented as mean±standard deviation (SD).
Group I, rats dialyzed with glucose solution; Group II, rats dialyzed with glucose solution containing aminoguanidine; Group III, rats dialyzed with glucose solution containing alagebrium.
*p<0.05 Control group vs. alagebrium group; †p<0.05 Aminoguanidine group vs. alagebrium group.
Changes in body weight (grams)
Data are presented as mean±standard deviation (SD).
Group I, rats dialyzed with glucose solution; Group II, rats dialyzed with glucose solution containing aminoguanidine; Group III, rats dialyzed with glucose solution containing alagebrium.