Literature DB >> 19194114

Triage with the French Emergency Nurses Classification in Hospital scale: reliability and validity.

Pierre Taboulet1, Véronique Moreira, Laurent Haas, Rapheal Porcher, Adelia Braganca, Jean-Paul Fontaine, Marie-Cecile Poncet.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The FRench Emergency Nurses Classification in Hospital scale (FRENCH) is the first French triage tool for patients visiting an emergency department. The FRENCH scale modified in 2006, based on about 100 determinants (complaints, signs, and vital parameters), allows the triage of adult patients according to five increasing levels of complexity/severity. We evaluated FRENCH version 2 (v.2) in our emergency department.
METHODS: Reliability was evaluated on 300 prospectively selected patient records (50% of patients admitted). Three nurse pairs, blinded with respect to the original triage, retrospectively and independently triaged 100 patients. Interrater reliability within the pairs was measured with a weighted kappa. Validity was evaluated on all triaged patients (N=941) over 14 days by studying the relationships between the original triage category assigned by the triage nurse and resource consumption and the admission rate.
RESULTS: Interrater reliability was good [K=0.77 (95% confidence interval: 0.71-0.82)]. Distribution of the 941 patients included in the validation study (18% of whom were admitted) was as follows [n (%)]: 2 (0.2), 33 (4), 258 (27), 451 (48), and 197 (21) for a triage from 1 to 5, respectively. Resource consumption correlated well with case severity as assessed by the triage category (R=-0.643, P<0.0001). Finally, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for prediction of admission as a function of triage was 0.858 (95% confidence interval: 0.831-0.885).
CONCLUSION: FRENCH v.2 is a reliable and validated triage tool to predict the complexity/severity of a patient in our emergency department.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19194114     DOI: 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e328304ae57

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Emerg Med        ISSN: 0969-9546            Impact factor:   2.799


  19 in total

1.  To score or not to score during triage in the emergency department?

Authors:  Christian Mélot
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Combination of clinical and ECG criteria may increase validity of triage scales: authors' reply.

Authors:  Melanie Dechamps; Diego Castanares-Zapatero; Alessandro Manara
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 3.397

3.  Comparison of clinical-based and ECG-based triage of acute chest pain in the Emergency Department.

Authors:  Melanie Dechamps; Diego Castanares-Zapatero; Patrick Vanden Berghe; Philippe Meert; Alessandro Manara
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 3.397

4.  Pitfalls in the triage and evaluation of patients with suspected acute ethanol intoxication in an emergency department.

Authors:  Sarah Dugas; Thierry Favrod-Coune; Pierre-Alexandre Poletti; Tibor Huwyler; Hélène Richard-Lepouriel; Josette Simon; François P Sarasin; Olivier T Rutschmann
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2018-12-14       Impact factor: 3.397

5.  Improving the performance of a triage scale for chest pain patients admitted to emergency departments: combining cardiovascular risk factors and electrocardiogram.

Authors:  Chiara Casarin; Anne-Sophie Pirot; Charles Gregoire; Laurence Van Der Haert; Patrick Vanden Berghe; Diego Castanares-Zapatero; Melanie Dechamps
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2022-07-04

Review 6.  Emergency department triage scales and their components: a systematic review of the scientific evidence.

Authors:  Nasim Farrohknia; Maaret Castrén; Anna Ehrenberg; Lars Lind; Sven Oredsson; Håkan Jonsson; Kjell Asplund; Katarina E Göransson
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 2.953

7.  Be careful with triage in emergency departments: interobserver agreement on 1,578 patients in France.

Authors:  Anne-Claire Durand; Stéphanie Gentile; Patrick Gerbeaux; Marc Alazia; Pierre Kiegel; Stephane Luigi; Eric Lindenmeyer; Philippe Olivier; Marie-Annick Hidoux; Roland Sambuc
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2011-10-31

8.  Biomarkers from distinct biological pathways improve early risk stratification in medical emergency patients: the multinational, prospective, observational TRIAGE study.

Authors:  Philipp Schuetz; Pierre Hausfater; Devendra Amin; Adina Amin; Sebastian Haubitz; Lukas Faessler; Alexander Kutz; Antoinette Conca; Barbara Reutlinger; Pauline Canavaggio; Gabrielle Sauvin; Maguy Bernard; Andreas Huber; Beat Mueller
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 9.097

9.  The Copenhagen Triage Algorithm: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Rasmus Bo Hasselbalch; Louis Lind Plesner; Mia Pries-Heje; Lisbet Ravn; Morten Lind; Rasmus Greibe; Birgitte Nybo Jensen; Lars S Rasmussen; Kasper Iversen
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 2.953

10.  Clinical Outcome Predictive Value of Procalcitonin in Patients Suspected with Infection in the Emergency Department.

Authors:  Pierre Leroux; Sébastien De Ruffi; Laurent Ramont; Marion Gornet; Guillaume Giordano Orsini; Xavier Losset; Lukshe Kanagaratnam; Stéphane Gennai
Journal:  Emerg Med Int       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 1.112

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.