Literature DB >> 19193250

Optimal design of photoreceptor mosaics: why we do not see color at night.

Jeremy R Manning1, David H Brainard.   

Abstract

While color vision mediated by rod photoreceptors in dim light is possible (Kelber & Roth, 2006), most animals, including humans, do not see in color at night. This is because their retinas contain only a single class of rod photoreceptors. Many of these same animals have daylight color vision, mediated by multiple classes of cone photoreceptors. We develop a general formulation, based on Bayesian decision theory, to evaluate the efficacy of various retinal photoreceptor mosaics. The formulation evaluates each mosaic under the assumption that its output is processed to optimally estimate the image. It also explicitly takes into account the statistics of the environmental image ensemble. Using the general formulation, we consider the trade-off between monochromatic and dichromatic retinal designs as a function of overall illuminant intensity. We are able to demonstrate a set of assumptions under which the prevalent biological pattern represents optimal processing. These assumptions include an image ensemble characterized by high correlations between image intensities at nearby locations, as well as high correlations between intensities in different wavelength bands. They also include a constraint on receptor photopigment biophysics and/or the information carried by different wavelengths that produces an asymmetry in the signal-to-noise ratio of the output of different receptor classes. Our results thus provide an optimality explanation for the evolution of color vision for daylight conditions and monochromatic vision for nighttime conditions. An additional result from our calculations is that regular spatial interleaving of two receptor classes in a dichromatic retina yields performance superior to that of a retina where receptors of the same class are clumped together.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19193250      PMCID: PMC2671005          DOI: 10.1017/S095252380808084X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vis Neurosci        ISSN: 0952-5238            Impact factor:   3.241


  60 in total

1.  Metabolically efficient information processing.

Authors:  V Balasubramanian; D Kimber; M J Berry
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.026

2.  Optimal nonlinear codes for the perception of natural colours.

Authors:  T von der Twer; D I MacLeod
Journal:  Network       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.273

3.  On the relation between the photoactivation energy and the absorbance spectrum of visual pigments.

Authors:  Petri Ala-Laurila; Johan Pahlberg; Ari Koskelainen; Kristian Donner
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  A theory of maximizing sensory information.

Authors:  J H van Hateren
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.086

5.  Are cone sensitivities determined by natural color statistics?

Authors:  Alex Lewis; Li Zhaoping
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2006-03-21       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Light adaptation in cat retinal rods.

Authors:  T Tamura; K Nakatani; K W Yau
Journal:  Science       Date:  1989-08-18       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Irregularity and aliasing: solution?

Authors:  T R Bossomaier; A W Snyder; A Hughes
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 8.  Fruits, foliage and the evolution of primate colour vision.

Authors:  B C Regan; C Julliot; B Simmen; F Viénot; P Charles-Dominique; J D Mollon
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2001-03-29       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Design of a trichromatic cone array.

Authors:  Patrick Garrigan; Charles P Ratliff; Jennifer M Klein; Peter Sterling; David H Brainard; Vijay Balasubramanian
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-02-12       Impact factor: 4.475

Review 10.  Visual pigments and the acquisition of visual information.

Authors:  J N Lythgoe; J C Partridge
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Contributions of ideal observer theory to vision research.

Authors:  Wilson S Geisler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-11-09       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Color, Pattern, and the Retinal Cone Mosaic.

Authors:  David H Brainard
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2019-07-05

3.  The effect of TIMP-1 on the cone mosaic in the retina of the rat model of retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  Yerina Ji; Wan-Qing Yu; Yun Sung Eom; Farouk Bruce; Cheryl Mae Craft; Norberto M Grzywacz; Eun-Jin Lee
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Design of a trichromatic cone array.

Authors:  Patrick Garrigan; Charles P Ratliff; Jennifer M Klein; Peter Sterling; David H Brainard; Vijay Balasubramanian
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-02-12       Impact factor: 4.475

5.  Avian cone photoreceptors tile the retina as five independent, self-organizing mosaics.

Authors:  Yoseph A Kram; Stephanie Mantey; Joseph C Corbo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  toBeeView: a program for simulating the retinal image of visual scenes on nonhuman eyes.

Authors:  Miguel A Rodríguez-Gironés; Alberto Ruiz
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  An image reconstruction framework for characterizing initial visual encoding.

Authors:  Ling-Qi Zhang; Nicolas P Cottaris; David H Brainard
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 8.140

8.  The Importance of Spatial Visual Scene Parameters in Predicting Optimal Cone Sensitivities in Routinely Trichromatic Frugivorous Old-World Primates.

Authors:  Tristan Matthews; Daniel Osorio; Andrea Cavallaro; Lars Chittka
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 2.380

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.