Literature DB >> 19192315

Relative diagnostic importance of electronystagmography and magnetic resonance imaging in vestibular disorders.

S Korres1, Maria Riga, G Papacharalampous, T Chimona, V Danielidis, G Korres, J Xenellis.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the contribution of electronystagmography and magnetic resonance imaging to the aetiological diagnosis of vertigo and unsteadiness, in a population in which the history and clinical examination provide no conclusive diagnosis of the origin of the dysfunction (i.e. peripheral or central). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 102 patients, who underwent full ENT clinical evaluation, history and neurotological assessment (including pure tone audiography, auditory brainstem response testing, electronystagmography and magnetic resonance imaging).
RESULTS: Electronystagmography contributed to establishment of a diagnosis in 53/102 patients (52 per cent), whereas magnetic resonance imaging did the same in four of 102 patients (3.9 per cent).
CONCLUSION: Electronystagmography remains the most useful examination for aetiological diagnosis of patients with vertigo and unsteadiness, since the actual number of patients with vertigo and unsteadiness of central origin is small (3.9 per cent), even in a population in which history and clinical examination may indicate an increased probability of central nervous system dysfunction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19192315     DOI: 10.1017/S0022215109004630

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Laryngol Otol        ISSN: 0022-2151            Impact factor:   1.469


  3 in total

1.  Central vestibular dysfunction in an otorhinolaryngological vestibular unit: incidence and diagnostic strategy.

Authors:  Badr E Mostafa; Ayman O El Kahky; Hisham M Abdel Kader; Michael Rizk
Journal:  Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-03-21

2.  Epley manoeuvre for posterior semicircular canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo in people with multiple sclerosis: protocol of a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Cristina García-Muñoz; María-Dolores Cortés-Vega; Juan Carlos Hernández-Rodríguez; Rocio Palomo-Carrión; Rocío Martín-Valero; María Jesús Casuso-Holgado
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 3.  Electronystagmography versus videonystagmography.

Authors:  Maurício Malavasi Ganança; Heloísa Helena Caovilla; Fernando Freitas Ganança
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010 May-Jun
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.