AIMS: To understand the perspective of hospital-based health professionals with regard to preparing patients for discharge from an acute hospital in England. BACKGROUND: The hospital experience in England over recent years is characterised by increasing admission rates and decreasing length of stay. Legislation and policy initiatives have also focussed upon the need to reduce delayed discharges. Discharge preparation is known to be a complex intervention with multiple obstacles within and outside of the hospital setting. DESIGN: Qualitative. METHODS: Posters were displayed within a hospital asking health professionals to take part in a focus group. Maximum variation, in terms of job titles, was sought for within the sample. Focus groups were held in December 2006. Six senior members of staff divided into pairs to run them. All groups were taped and transcribed verbatim and analysed using a framework approach. RESULTS: Three focus groups were conducted, which involved 11 nurses, 15 allied health professionals, five social workers and one doctor. Analysis identified the following themes and sub themes: 1 Conflicting pressures on staff: Keeping patients in hospital vs. getting them out; Striving for flexibility within a system; A paucity of intermediary provision. 2 Casualties arising from conflicting pressures: Professionals losing their sense of professionalism; Patients being 'systematised'. CONCLUSIONS: Pressures described during focus groups stemmed from five main sources: external targets placed upon the system, internal hospital inflexibility and poor communication, the dominance of the medical model of care, a desire to address the complex needs of individuals and a lack of community services. Staff felt themselves to be victims of these competing pressures and that many of the solutions were beyond their influence. Staff described the dehumanising effect of sometimes having to ignore patient concerns, wishes and choices. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Understanding of the pressures surrounding discharge could inform relevant service improvements.
AIMS: To understand the perspective of hospital-based health professionals with regard to preparing patients for discharge from an acute hospital in England. BACKGROUND: The hospital experience in England over recent years is characterised by increasing admission rates and decreasing length of stay. Legislation and policy initiatives have also focussed upon the need to reduce delayed discharges. Discharge preparation is known to be a complex intervention with multiple obstacles within and outside of the hospital setting. DESIGN: Qualitative. METHODS: Posters were displayed within a hospital asking health professionals to take part in a focus group. Maximum variation, in terms of job titles, was sought for within the sample. Focus groups were held in December 2006. Six senior members of staff divided into pairs to run them. All groups were taped and transcribed verbatim and analysed using a framework approach. RESULTS: Three focus groups were conducted, which involved 11 nurses, 15 allied health professionals, five social workers and one doctor. Analysis identified the following themes and sub themes: 1 Conflicting pressures on staff: Keeping patients in hospital vs. getting them out; Striving for flexibility within a system; A paucity of intermediary provision. 2 Casualties arising from conflicting pressures: Professionals losing their sense of professionalism; Patients being 'systematised'. CONCLUSIONS: Pressures described during focus groups stemmed from five main sources: external targets placed upon the system, internal hospital inflexibility and poor communication, the dominance of the medical model of care, a desire to address the complex needs of individuals and a lack of community services. Staff felt themselves to be victims of these competing pressures and that many of the solutions were beyond their influence. Staff described the dehumanising effect of sometimes having to ignore patient concerns, wishes and choices. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Understanding of the pressures surrounding discharge could inform relevant service improvements.
Authors: Joanne Goldman; Scott Reeves; Robert Wu; Ivan Silver; Kathleen MacMillan; Simon Kitto Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2015-04-14 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Antonio Rojas-García; Simon Turner; Elena Pizzo; Emma Hudson; James Thomas; Rosalind Raine Journal: Health Expect Date: 2017-09-12 Impact factor: 3.377